Page 1 of 2

Doherty on Rivals Radio

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:09 pm
by Grider
Here's a link to download the Doherty Interview last Tuesday on Rivals Radio.

http://vmedia.rivals.com/uploads/1135/355385.wma

Hope this works........

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:49 pm
by mustangbill67
Thanks! Good interview. But no questions on recruiting.

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:13 am
by Stallion
Coaches can't publicly comment about prospective recruits until they sign.

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:21 am
by ponyplayer
They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:08 am
by PK
ponyplayer wrote:They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................
How did you arrive at that conclusion? You are wrong...Stallion's statement is the correct one.

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:08 am
by Duke Blue Blood
The interviewer sounds fake....weird voice.

DBB

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:36 am
by ponyplayer
PK wrote:
ponyplayer wrote:They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................
How did you arrive at that conclusion? You are wrong...Stallion's statement is the correct one.


"Before the signing of a prospect to a ltter of intent an institution may comment publicy only to the extent of confirming its recruitiment of the propect. the institution may not comment generally about the prospect`s ability or the contribution that that the prospect might make to the institution`s team:further, the institution may not comment as to whether the prospect will sign with that institution."

case closed...........................................

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:41 am
by mustangbill67
Well, he could have asked questionis about recruiting generally and whether there was a possibility of any spring signees. Of course, Doh may have put all such questions off limits for the interview.

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:51 am
by PonyPride
ponyplayer wrote: .... "Before the signing of a prospect to a ltter of intent an institution may comment publicy only to the extent of confirming its recruitiment of the propect. the institution may not comment generally about the prospect`s ability or the contribution that that the prospect might make to the institution`s team:further, the institution may not comment as to whether the prospect will sign with that institution."

case closed...........................................
Nice going, ponyplayer -- ruin this with facts. You're fired.

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:18 pm
by ponyplayer
PonyPride wrote:
ponyplayer wrote: .... "Before the signing of a prospect to a ltter of intent an institution may comment publicy only to the extent of confirming its recruitiment of the propect. the institution may not comment generally about the prospect`s ability or the contribution that that the prospect might make to the institution`s team:further, the institution may not comment as to whether the prospect will sign with that institution."

case closed...........................................
Nice going, ponyplayer -- ruin this with facts. You're fired.


I know, always ruin everything with facts instead of empirical data....I fired myself long time ago.................

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 pm
by PK
ponyplayer wrote:
PK wrote:
ponyplayer wrote:They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................
How did you arrive at that conclusion? You are wrong...Stallion's statement is the correct one.


"Before the signing of a prospect to a ltter of intent an institution may comment publicy only to the extent of confirming its recruitiment of the propect. the institution may not comment generally about the prospect`s ability or the contribution that that the prospect might make to the institution`s team:further, the institution may not comment as to whether the prospect will sign with that institution."

case closed...........................................
I stand corrected...basically. However, it does say that they can only "confirm" that they are recruiting some one which implys that the comment would be in response to a question and not that in general that an institution would just state who they are recruiting. It also would preclude stating that a recruit had committed to the school until after the letter of intent is signed.


For reference, the article that covers this is:

13.10.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospect to a National Letter of Intent or an institution’s written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly
only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospect. The institution may not comment generally about the prospect’s ability or the contribution that the prospect might make to the institution’s team; further,
the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospect’s signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospect’s eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 4:40 pm
by ponyplayer
PK wrote:
ponyplayer wrote:They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................
How did you arrive at that conclusion? You are wrong...Stallion's statement is the correct one.


come on PK, don`t dis me like that.............................

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 5:00 pm
by PK
ponyplayer wrote:
PK wrote:
ponyplayer wrote:They can acknowledge who they are recruiting, just can not say anything about how the recruit will impact their program..................
How did you arrive at that conclusion? You are wrong...Stallion's statement is the correct one.


come on PK, don`t dis me like that.............................
Two responses to the same post?....Who is dissing who? I already stated that "I stand corrected"...sort of. :roll: :)

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:49 pm
by that's great raplh
Duke Blue Blood wrote:The interviewer sounds fake....weird voice.

DBB


i thinks it is an interviewing robot

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 7:42 pm
by RGV Pony
that's great raplh wrote:
Duke Blue Blood wrote:The interviewer sounds fake....weird voice.

DBB


i thinks it is an interviewing robot


Guy Sports?