Here's the thing, what's the model here? Are we really going to try and out athlete Memphis, Tulsa, UTEP, Houston and other noteworthy diploma mills? Are we going to put better athletes on the floor then the high majors we play OOC like A&M & South florida? The elephant in the room is the high mid model. Basically, high skill guys, slower tempo, and look like Butler. Nobody wants to hear it, but if you look at the school's demographics, it makes sense.
The idea of recruiting locally is great, and it needs to be addressed, but look at the Top 25 players in Texas in '10 There are high major guys that go Big 12, some mids that choose Tulsa/UTEP, and low majors. I buy that we should get a Top kid every few years, but look at the national trend. Each year, of the top 150 national players, maybe 7-11 go mid-major. That means to get a Top 150 player nationally each year, we'd almost always have to get a Top 10 kid in Texas, if not higher.
The issue here is coaching and team/roster building. This roster is a collection of parts, strung together by Lutz, w/basically no help. We've had 6 or 7 assistants in 4 years. That makes developing local success an impossibility. We look like spare parts b/c we've been running around w/a spare parts staff. I think that would change w/Brown & Geary, but who cares, cause Doh isn't changing.
DFW gets fixed when Orsini commits to bringing the right folks in, to help aid in the right hire. Even w/a DFW specialist, the odds are that we get a top 10 kid in Texas, maybe every other, or every 3rd year. In 20 years, we've had maybe 6 or 7 national top 100 kids, and they were all like 90s. The issue is having a real system that makes sense for the kinds of kids we can recruit. Discipline matters b/c we're not going to always have better athletes.
Evaluation is always an issue. I know we passed on a few kids this past cycle, that wanted in, but we didn't have ship space. Had they have waited till Spring, they would have really helped, considering what we've seen on the court so far this winter. One went to another CUSA school w/far more on court success, and we said 'no thanks'. You roll the dice w/who you think is the best. Ultimately, you're either brilliant or an [deleted].
The beauty here is that the '10 kids are signed. Fire Doh, promote Lutz to interim, see what we get this year. At the end of the year, if Lutz performs well, you give him an interview. Beyond that, go low key and get first rate assistant in here like Springman, the first day you can. Have him assemble a staff to dominate locally, and go to work. First priority is keeping the '10 class in the fold. The following link shows that our '10 class is a top 3 class in CUSA, especially if we add a kid or two.
http://insider.espn.go.com/ncb/recruiti ... son%3d2010SMU has to recruit nationally/internationally, but that doesn't make it acceptable to be iced out at home. We need DFW to represent to really be high mid like Gonzaga