Page 1 of 1

Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:12 pm
by CalallenStang
to UTEP

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:14 pm
by PonyDoh
gotta get after them this year b/c reinforcements are coming

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:19 pm
by papawasamustang
PonyDoh wrote:gotta get after them this year b/c reinforcements are coming


Hey PD, that's what they are saying about us with our 10 recruiting class :)
Seriously, add a PG & I really like our class.

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:21 pm
by CalallenStang
papawasamustang wrote:Seriously, add a much discussed PG & I really like our class.


Haven't we all been saying that the past two to three recruiting classes?

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:23 pm
by papawasamustang
Yes we have. Even with a healthy Luttman, last years recruiting class of Clink & Luttman looks really weak IMO.

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:33 pm
by Pony_Fan
papawasamustang wrote:Yes we have. Even with a healthy Luttman, last years recruiting class of Clink & Luttman looks really weak IMO.

yes, very weak class

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:38 pm
by CalallenStang
papawasamustang wrote:Yes we have. Even with a healthy Luttman, last years recruiting class of Clink & Luttman looks really weak IMO.


true

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:39 am
by PonyDoh
CalallenStang wrote:
papawasamustang wrote:Seriously, add a much discussed PG & I really like our class.


Haven't we all been saying that the past two to three recruiting classes?


'07 was too hyped for it's actual skill level. There wasn't much polish there, just some decently high ceilings. Dia & Nuk are keepers, but I always liked Malone offensively, so it's a shame both he and Rhodes couldn't get it going. Malone was an effective scorer as a frosh. I don't remember much hype around '08 other then McCoy and possibly Otis, who was still just a 3 star kid. Luttman/Clink was a bad class, mostly b/c of the assistant turnover. '10 has, by far, the most actual skill level of those classes. It will also rank worse then 07 and maybe 08, just b/c of the Euro's, as well as Smith who didn't really travel very much on the AAU circuit. Easily a Top 3 class in the league, but won't be rated that way. As Papa said, we need a PG badly.

Re: Memphis loses

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:50 am
by mr. pony
PonyDoh wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
papawasamustang wrote:Seriously, add a much discussed PG & I really like our class.


Haven't we all been saying that the past two to three recruiting classes?


'07 was too hyped for it's actual skill level. There wasn't much polish there, just some decently high ceilings. Dia & Nuk are keepers, but I always liked Malone offensively, so it's a shame both he and Rhodes couldn't get it going. Malone was an effective scorer as a frosh. I don't remember much hype around '08 other then McCoy and possibly Otis, who was still just a 3 star kid. Luttman/Clink was a bad class, mostly b/c of the assistant turnover. '10 has, by far, the most actual skill level of those classes. It will also rank worse then 07 and maybe 08, just b/c of the Euro's, as well as Smith who didn't really travel very much on the AAU circuit. Easily a Top 3 class in the league, but won't be rated that way. As Papa said, we need a PG badly.


C'mon. Is your real name Donny Nelson?