EastStang wrote:The Big Ten has to see value on two fronts, (1) monetary namely the new sum is greater than the old sum, and (2) internal strife. Let's say they add Pitt. (1) Will adding Pitt increase revenues enough to justify splitting the pie for one extra mouth? (2) Okay, that means two divisions. Do you split up Ohio State and Michigan into separate divisions? Do you split up Pitt and Penn State? Minnesota-Wisconsin? Indiana -Purdue? Illinois - Northwestern? And if you don't, then which group of teams gets to be the red-eyed step children that are in a division other than the Ohio State/Michigan Division. The Pac 10 adding two teams same issues. Will adding two teams add sufficient conference revenue via TV contracts to justify feeding two more mouths? And I can hear Oregon and Washington complaining that they are in a different division than USC and UCLA. The problem is not the dream of 12 teams, but what you do once you have them.
Big 10 South:
Penn State
Pitt
Ohio State
Indiana
Illinois
Iowa
Big 10 North:
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Michigan
Michigan State
Northwestern
Purdue
Scheduling:
Each team plays every other team in their division each year. This is 5 games.
Each team will play a partner opponent from the other division (see below) each year. 1 game.
Each team will play two other opponents from the other division each year. 2 games.
8 games total.
Partner Opponents:
Indiana-Purdue
Michigan-Ohio State
Minnesota-Iowa
Northwestern-Illinois
Wisconsin-Penn State
Michigan State-Pittsburgh