Page 1 of 2

SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:25 pm
by CalallenStang
End of Dement Era
2003-2004 - 169

Tubbs Era
2004-2005 - 169
2005-2006 - 268

Doherty Era
2006-2007 - 207
2007-2008 - 265
2008-2009 - 267
2009-2010 - 208

Final RPIs courtesy of RealTimeRPI.com

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:10 am
by The PonyGrad
Top 200 in everything we do... er top 210??
:? :oops: :roll: :cry: :evil:

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:34 am
by PonyDoh
Need a better schedule, but it's amazing how much schedule talk specific to Doh, their has been when it's relatively been the same for years and years.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:52 pm
by smu diamond m
I'm guessing the bouncing around at the bottom ranks means little to nothing in terms of improvement.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:43 am
by The PonyGrad
smu diamond m wrote:I'm guessing the bouncing around at the bottom ranks means little to nothing in terms of improvement.

Has little meaning or means little improvement??
:?

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:36 am
by Dooby
We are doing our level-headed best to show patience with Doh. We need to show the next guy we will give him the time he needs to right the ship. I don't have confidence in Doh anymore, but we are giving him one more year for making the mistake of canning Tubbs too quickly. I hated Tubbs and wish we had never hired him, but we should have given him another year and not come up with a trumped up secondary violation as an excuse to can him.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:26 am
by Hoop Fan
you hated Tubbs? Nice. Any coach deserves 4 years to show progress. 3 is not enough (certainly not 2), but you don't need 5 years to see what a coach is all about. The 4th year is the all important critical year. Even at SMU where we have an excuse for everything, because even here, momentum and confidence matters. 14-17 is a big thud in year 4.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:08 pm
by moodymadmen
Hoop Fan wrote:you hated Tubbs? Nice. Any coach deserves 4 years to show progress. 3 is not enough (certainly not 2), but you don't need 5 years to see what a coach is all about. The 4th year is the all important critical year. Even at SMU where we have an excuse for everything, because even here, momentum and confidence matters. 14-17 is a big thud in year 4.


Especially when you only win 15% of the games vs the respectable teams on your schedule. Take away the 7 wins against the non-conference cupcakes plus 3 against CUSA cellar dwellers rice and tulane and the all-important 4th year was even worse then you think.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:46 am
by Pony_Fan
Hoop Fan wrote:you hated Tubbs? Nice. Any coach deserves 4 years to show progress. 3 is not enough (certainly not 2), but you don't need 5 years to see what a coach is all about. The 4th year is the all important critical year. Even at SMU where we have an excuse for everything, because even here, momentum and confidence matters. 14-17 is a big thud in year 4.


Two bad hires in a row sets us back about 10 yrs.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:02 pm
by SoCal_Pony
These are over half of Doh's victories at SMU, almost all at Moody.

1 Florida Gulf Coast
2 Huston-Tillotson
3 Texas State
4 at Occidental
5 North Carolina Central
6 Houston Baptist
7 Houston Baptist
8 Alabama State
9 Texas A&M-Int
10 Texas A&M-CC
11 Cal State Bakersfield
12 Paul Quinn
13 at Texas-San Antonio
14 Houston Baptist
15 Prairie View A&M
16 vs. Texas State*
17 McNeese State
18 Louisiana-Monroe
19 Paul Quinn
20 Texas College
21 Prairie View A&M
22 at Centenary
23 Texas-Pan American
24 Brown

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:17 pm
by PK
:roll: RPI or RIP?

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:40 pm
by RGV Pony
SoCal_Pony wrote:These are over half of Doh's victories at SMU, almost all at Moody.

1 Florida Gulf Coast
2 Huston-Tillotson
3 Texas State
4 at Occidental
5 North Carolina Central
6 Houston Baptist
7 Houston Baptist
8 Alabama State
9 Texas A&M-Int
10 Texas A&M-CC
11 Cal State Bakersfield
12 Paul Quinn
13 at Texas-San Antonio
14 Houston Baptist
15 Prairie View A&M
16 vs. Texas State*
17 McNeese State
18 Louisiana-Monroe
19 Paul Quinn
20 Texas College
21 Prairie View A&M
22 at Centenary
23 Texas-Pan American
24 Brown


you forgot SC Upstate and Ark-Pine Bluff. Oh yeah. We L O S T to both of those. At Moody.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:38 pm
by Stallion
that list always makes me chuckle and realize how happy I am that I stopped buying season tickets. When I stopped going to crappy non-conference games because of their annual crappy non-conference schedule, I realized I could live without SMU Basketball entirely. I know everybody schedules cupcakes now-I don't care-I am not going to pay money to watch crap. There is too high a percentage of meaningless games in College Basketball. And considering that College Basketball is not exactly getting great ratings these days maybe some schools should be taking note of the product they force their fans to watch.

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:05 pm
by RGV Pony
sorry that I can't let it go, but didnt we also lose to NC A&T?

Re: SMU Final RPI History: Last 7 years

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:07 pm
by PonyDoh
Stallion wrote:that list always makes me chuckle and realize how happy I am that I stopped buying season tickets. When I stopped going to crappy non-conference games because of their annual crappy non-conference schedule, I realized I could live without SMU Basketball entirely. I know everybody schedules cupcakes now-I don't care-I am not going to pay money to watch crap. There is too high a percentage of meaningless games in College Basketball. And considering that College Basketball is not exactly getting great ratings these days maybe some schools should be taking note of the product they force their fans to watch.


Both hoops and football scheduling are contrived to the point of impotency these days.