PonyDoh wrote:Balatro Diabolus Ex wrote:ponyboy wrote:Does he have to guarantee that all will be eligible in order for us to have a upper-tier CUSA team?
Upper tier??????????? What are you smoking?
You don't think SMU has a top 3- 5 roster in CUSA based on talent next year? I've checked the leagues rosters up and down, and seen many, if not most, of the leagues incoming kids. No problem w/you disagreeing, but don't just drive-by. Who is better 1-13 by more than a little bit?
Fair enough, and the simple answer to your question is No, I dont think SMU has anything close to a top 5 roster next year. There are several reasons why, and your question deserves more of an answer than I have time to write at this moment. but I will tell you who, off the top of my head, I see as the best returning rosters for next season.
1) Memphis- Dont think I need to explain that one.
2.) UCF- Fastest rising team in C-USA, currently 10-0 with notable wins over Miami and U. of Florida, I've seen them ranked in the top-25 in one poll. All 5 starters are underclassmen, and should be back next year.
3.) UAB- Consistent 20 game winner and top half of the conference, currently 9-2 with a notable win over Arkansas. 3 starters are underclassmen, including leading scorer/rebounder Cameron Moore. Freshman class is playing alot of minutes. Only one signee in the early period, but KC Whitaker is a 3-star on Rivals, and ESPN rates him slightly higher than SMU signee Ryan Manuel.
4.) Rice- 5 starters are underclassmen, including Arslan Kazemi, Tamir Jackson, and Lucas Kuipers. 3 incoming recruits are all tall guards who had a lot off mid-major offers, and Jared Reischelle had offers from several schools in the Big East.
5.) Marshall- 8-2 so far this season, no notable wins, but they start 4 underclassmen, and Tyrell Baines is the only senior on the roster. Signed 3 in the early period, and JC transfer Dennis Tinnon should step into Baines spot immediately.
6.) Tulsa- Program is consistently in the top 4 of the conference, and consistently in the NIT. This year a young rebuilding team is struggling with injuries, but they start 4 underclassmen, and 2 other young players have started to cover guys out with injuries. Only 1 signee in the early signing period, but Rashad Smith was a player SMU tried to sign, and was also offered by Texas Tech, he's a solid player who should improve with time in the weight room. He'll contribute as a freshman, although it will be competitive to get playing time on a very experienced roster.
I could go on, but let me wrap it up by saying that SMU will be far and away the most inexperienced team in C-USA next year. I expect us to return 3 lettermen from this years team, maybe less. On experience alone, I dont see any way we can touch the top half of the conference next year. UTEP and Southern Miss will also be hit very hard by graduation, but they will return more experienced players than SMU will.
There are a couple more reasons I dont have time to outline fully, but I'll try to get back this evening, perhaps after the game.