PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Next Step

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Next Step

Postby RunningStang » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:39 am

Win big in football.
RunningStang
Varsity
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:05 pm

Re: Next Step

Postby MustangIcon » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:00 am

CoxMustangFan wrote:It appears the Big East establishment is really not happy about adding SMU as a basketball school. I know many of you are understandably excited about the talent upgrade that SMU is currently experiencing. I was speaking with a die-hard Big East fan recently and he said "SMU's best players wouldn't be walk-ons at many Big East schools". Aside from the compliance matters that some have mentioned, what does SMU need to do to NOT be considered the leprous red-headed step child of the Big East?


That is an interesting comment. I am not going to 100% disagree or 100% agree, but here is my take.

We have 4 players that were top players in the country coming out of high school. All were recruited at a Big East level and received offers from prestigious, national programs.
- S Williams: #67 player in the country
- Cunningham: Top 100 player in the country
- Blaise: Top 100 player in the country
- N Russell: Something like the #115 player in the country per Rivals

Naykundi is a more valuable player than some folks on scholarship at Big East schools. If only bc he is guy with length that can shoot 40-50% from downtown. Coming out of high school he was not as highly acclaimed of course.

Bernardi was supposed to be getting pretty strong consideration from some BE programs.

Do I think we have a Big East caliber team yet? No. Is it correct to say our best players wouldn't be walk-ons at Big East programs? No. Your die hard Big East friend is full of sh*t if you ask me.
MustangIcon
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:29 am

Next Step

Postby 2ndandlong » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:32 am

MustangIcon wrote:
That is an interesting comment. I am not going to 100% disagree or 100% agree, but here is my take.


I thought that was a requirement of message boards in general.
"This is . . . dedication to distraction by fans. Is that what I'm going to go with Jay?"
"That poor kid has to be wondering what is dad doing."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XknLDwj0dSo
User avatar
2ndandlong
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2250
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:13 am
Location: University Park

Re: Next Step

Postby Treadway21 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:48 am

What we need to do is beat some good teams - starting with Memphis. We have a long way to go, but just getting into the conference is a starting point. Until we start competing well in the conference, SMU fans will just have to put up with the slights.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Treadway21
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6586
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Next Step

Postby smubrooks » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:58 am

I think we will be competetive at the lower to middle level in the BE once we get there. And recruiting will only improve with the move. 5 yrs from now they won't look down on us with such distain.
Pony Up!
User avatar
smubrooks
All-American
 
Posts: 956
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:42 am
Location: CT

Re: Next Step

Postby Monkeystang » Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:57 pm

MustangIcon wrote:
CoxMustangFan wrote:It appears the Big East establishment is really not happy about adding SMU as a basketball school. I know many of you are understandably excited about the talent upgrade that SMU is currently experiencing. I was speaking with a die-hard Big East fan recently and he said "SMU's best players wouldn't be walk-ons at many Big East schools". Aside from the compliance matters that some have mentioned, what does SMU need to do to NOT be considered the leprous red-headed step child of the Big East?


That is an interesting comment. I am not going to 100% disagree or 100% agree, but here is my take.

We have 4 players that were top players in the country coming out of high school. All were recruited at a Big East level and received offers from prestigious, national programs.
- S Williams: #67 player in the country
- Cunningham: Top 100 player in the country
- Blaise: Top 100 player in the country
- N Russell: Something like the #115 player in the country per Rivals

Naykundi is a more valuable player than some folks on scholarship at Big East schools. If only bc he is guy with length that can shoot 40-50% from downtown. Coming out of high school he was not as highly acclaimed of course.

Bernardi was supposed to be getting pretty strong consideration from some BE programs.

Do I think we have a Big East caliber team yet? No. Is it correct to say our best players wouldn't be walk-ons at Big East programs? No. Your die hard Big East friend is full of sh*t if you ask me.



I agree.
User avatar
Monkeystang
All-American
 
Posts: 534
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:54 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: Next Step

Postby hoopmanx » Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:48 pm

Your friend is definitely full of [deleted]. We have 6 guys currently, on the roster or committed, who were or would have been recruited at the Big East level. All of Williams/Blaise/Cunningham/Russell were top 100 kids by one or more services. I personally saw Vilde at Lee Academy, spoke w/their coach, as well as DC Assault brass, who had multiple kids stashed at Lee at the time. Big East coaches were all over Lee, but they stashed Vilde for SMU. Strict instructions that he's our guy, we're handing him to you for safe keeping etc. Many Big East teams inquired about him, only to get turned away by Lee's coach. Heck, he started over Desoto kid, Keith Davis, who gets about 16 minutes or so a game for 8-1 Texas A&M. Lutz told me just last week that Coach mcD at Creighton wanted Lutz to bring Vilde and Smith w/him. He likes Vilde more than any big of Creightons roster not named Doug McDermott. That includes Greg Echenique who was like rookie of the year at Rutgers as a frosh. First team all frosh at the very least

Ryan Manuel chose SMU over UNLV. Lew Hill, current assistant at OU, told Reggie Brown that UNLV & Kruger had Manuel in pen, and were shocked when he chose SMU. He also told Reggie that they thought he was a mid-high teens scorer by his junior year, if given run early. Had more schools watched him in high school as opposed to AAU, where Cam Ridley ate all the looks, he'd have been recruited at a high major level as well.

Leslee Smith blew up summer after his junior year at elite camps, and proceeded to barely play AAU ball. Simply, nobody put eyes on him to really evaluate him. He played one tourney in Cali his senior year, and USC immediately offered. Bernardi had a BCS offer, as did Uche etc.

Of course we need better players, but we have considerably more talent than we're being given credit. Kids need experience and in a couple of cases, to shake off some rust.
User avatar
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: Next Step

Postby ponyscott » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:01 pm

2ndandlong wrote:
MustangIcon wrote:
That is an interesting comment. I am not going to 100% disagree or 100% agree, but here is my take.


I thought that was a requirement of message boards in general.


A++ :lol:
User avatar
ponyscott
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7033
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:47 pm

Re: Next Step

Postby 1983 Cotton Bowl » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:20 pm

Once the renovations to Moody are completed in the next couple of years (presumably), then our facilities will be on par with or superior to most BE programs. There is some talent already on campus, more is set to arrive, and I anticipate that recruiting will continue to improve as we recruit kids as a BE program. Not to mention the fact that SMU sits right in the middle of a very strong recruiting area in DFW.

The current BE schools probably have the edge now, but I see that gap closing relatively quickly. I'm not saying we'll roll into the BE and immediately knock off UConn and Louisville. But I think we'll be more competitive than the current BE folks think.
User avatar
1983 Cotton Bowl
Heisman
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:17 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Next Step

Postby angryfan04 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:43 pm

and we need a real coach..........
angryfan04
Varsity
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 4:01 am
Location: McKinney

Re: Next Step

Postby MustangIcon » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:49 pm

angryfan04 wrote:and we need a real coach..........


I agree! And not just any coach. Someone who has Big East experience. And has won there. 20+ wins in the Big East. I want a coach with that kind of experience. Oh wait...

Matt Doherty- 22-15 in his lone season as head coach at ND before leaving for UNC. :P
MustangIcon
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:29 am

Re: Next Step

Postby ponyscott » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:25 pm

MustangIcon wrote:
angryfan04 wrote:and we need a real coach..........


I agree! And not just any coach. Someone who has Big East experience. And has won there. 20+ wins in the Big East. I want a coach with that kind of experience. Oh wait...

Matt Doherty- 22-15 in his lone season as head coach at ND before leaving for UNC. :P


He WILL be fine. The talent is there and the system is in place.
User avatar
ponyscott
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7033
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:47 pm

Re: Next Step

Postby hoopmanx » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:36 pm

I'm ready to play ball. 10 day layoff's don't work for me. Time to step up vs OSU or Miss, after whooping cupcakes.
User avatar
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: Next Step

Postby PonyPlayer4 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:03 pm

I'm glad we have this season and next season for our pups to gel before stepping in to the Big East.
User avatar
PonyPlayer4
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:47 pm
Location: Dallas, Tx

Re: Re: Next Step

Postby whitwiki » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:14 am

2ndandlong wrote:
MustangIcon wrote:
That is an interesting comment. I am not going to 100% disagree or 100% agree, but here is my take.


I thought that was a requirement of message boards in general.

100% disagree
User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
 
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Next

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests