Page 1 of 1

RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:08 am
by CalallenStang
Up from 215 on 1/5/2012 which was the last time I updated.

Here's CUSA:

http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_cusa_Men.html
Men's Basketball - Conference USA (2011-2012)

Conf. RPI Rank: 10 Conf. SOS Rank: 10
Only games against Division I opponents are counted.
Teams that made the tournament are in bold
This page updates daily.
Last updated - Sun Jan 15 09:30:03 PST 2012

View Power Ratings View Real Time RPIsvip


RPI Rk Conference USA Conf All RPI SOS Rk SOS
16 Southern Miss 3-1 14-3 0.6289 53 0.5529
29 Memphis 3-0 12-5 0.6090 13 0.5838
33 Marshall 4-0 12-4 0.6046 34 0.5655
68 UCF 3-1 12-4 0.5701 142 0.5073
141 UTEP 2-2 9-9 0.5116 79 0.5386
142 Tulsa 2-2 9-9 0.5099 106 0.5246
148 Rice 2-1 8-7 0.5053 152 0.5005
169 UAB 0-3 5-11 0.4911 33 0.5668
185 East Carolina 0-3 5-7 0.4834 108 0.5239
214 South. Methodist 1-2 7-8 0.4720 243 0.4695
215 Tulane 0-3 10-5 0.4716 333 0.4172
226 Houston 1-3 8-8 0.4642 195 0.4856

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:35 am
by LHS81
How many schools play D-1 Basketball? I thought I read somewhere it was 320.

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:09 pm
by CalallenStang
LHS81 wrote:How many schools play D-1 Basketball? I thought I read somewhere it was 320.


344

RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:46 pm
by GiddyUp
Really why does it matter what our RPI is

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:23 pm
by CalallenStang
GiddyUp wrote:Really why does it matter what our RPI is


Because the CBI and CIT are still not entirely out of the question, and because our RPI is much better than it was a few years ago. And because it's great to see where we fit in with the rest of the country (context).

But hey, if you don't want to discuss it, don't click on the thread.

Our RPIs at the end of the last few seasons:

2011: 207
2010: 208
2009: 267
2008: 265
2007: 207
2006: 268
2005: 169
2004: 169

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:27 pm
by LHS81
200+ RPI in the last 6 years...NOT GOOD

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:47 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
Moving from 215 to 214 is definitely a nice step in the right direction though. Go Ponies!

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:58 pm
by LHS81
I'm thinking the OT period in El Paso helped bump it up 1 spot.

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:18 pm
by CalallenStang
DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Moving from 215 to 214 is definitely a nice step in the right direction though. Go Ponies!


At this rate we can break 210 the end of the season

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:26 pm
by buckwheat
[quote="LHS81"]200+ RPI in the last 6 years...NOT GOOD[/quote]


Ouch, same ol same ol.

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:34 pm
by SMUer
The BE has got to have a pulse on this and at this point is offering "kind" suggestions to Orsini, right?

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:59 am
by hoopmanx
SMUer wrote:The BE has got to have a pulse on this and at this point is offering "kind" suggestions to Orsini, right?


What type of suggestions? Hey, come play in our league and your RPI will skyrocket just w/conference games? Not like we have to do to much to get a bump in the BE, just show up

Re: RPI: 214 (1/16/2012)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:27 am
by SMUer
Something like, we don't need another Providence, SMU...step it up!

So what we get a RPI bump automatically? We are struggling against sh*tty teams in a fairly sh*tty league. I've got to think the BE wants more middle-to-top teams than bottom-barrel teams in its conference.