PonyFans.com

And we only beat A&M by 3. Every game except Hofstra might be a grind imo.

As Hoopmanx pointed out, A&M was a better team with Reese, who is no longer on the team. I believe he was their leading scorer when we played them.

Rebel10 wrote:And we only beat A&M by 3. Every game except Hofstra might be a grind imo.

and not saying Aggie is good, but that was a fluke yesterday. I think it had to do with being on the same day as Johnny Footballs last game and the bball team not being focused or up for UNT.

I don't believe there are any gimmes left on the schedule except Hofstra.

Rebel10 wrote:I don't believe there are any gimmes left on the schedule except Hofstra.

Gimmes, I think you can throw Rutgers, USF and Temple in that category...

OhioBrownFan wrote:

Rebel10 wrote:I don't believe there are any gimmes left on the schedule except Hofstra.

Gimmes, I think you can throw Rutgers, USF and Temple in that category...

Please don't make anymore predictions because most of your prediction have been dead wrong. We can't take anyone lightly dude.

Rebel10 wrote:

OhioBrownFan wrote:

Rebel10 wrote:I don't believe there are any gimmes left on the schedule except Hofstra.

Gimmes, I think you can throw Rutgers, USF and Temple in that category...

Please don't make anymore predictions because most of your prediction have been dead wrong. We can't take anyone lightly dude.

lol, what predictions do I or have I made? Outside of saying I thought Nebraska could beat Cinci? But Rutgers, USF and Temple all blow. Like really awful teams. If any of those teams have more than 6 conference wins at the end of the year, I'll be stunned.

I'm not sure if you're familiar with those teams or how bad they are...
Rutgers: 7-7
RPI: 241
Best win: Temple by far
Lost to: William and Mary and 3-10 Farleigh Dickinson. That's laughable and a joke.

Temple: 5-6, Just lost their 6th man for the year
RPI: 125
Best win: Probably 8-4 St. Joe's
Lost to: 8-6 Towson, SEC bottom-feeder Georgia, those are unexplainable losses

USF: 9-5, not one decent win...
RPI: 175
Best win: SEC bottom feeder Alabama
Lost to: 5-7 Detroit, they did hang with Mississippi State I guess

I mean, these teams are jokes. You can probably throw UCF on the list too. They're complete crap. Obviously if you come out completely flat, SMU could lose, but that would be a horrible loss to any of those teams and you can pretty much kiss any chance of the Tourney good bye with it.

I don't care how many conference wins they have we can't take anyone lightly or we will have a me tough time trying to beat them.

I guess I just have a different expectation. I guess I don't expect a Brown coached team to take teams lightly

OBF, I have seen every team in our conference play and they are all better than anyone we have beaten with maybe the exception of Wyoming. And if we don't have the right personnel playing we are not going to beat hardly anybody. Are you confident enough to say that if we lose to one or more of those teams that you will stop posting on the board for the rest of the season?

Rebel10 wrote:OBF, I have seen every team in our conference play and they are all better than anyone we have beaten with maybe the exception of Wyoming. And if we don't have the right personnel playing we are not going to beat hardly anybody. Are you confident enough to say that if we lose to one or more of those teams that you will stop posting on the board for the rest of the season?

If you spot me a loss to anyone of those teams on the road, then yes. I mean, even Nebraska beat Minnesota at home last year. But yeah, I'd stop posting if you would agree to that. Or I'd do it straight up if you conversely agree to the same bet if SMU beats each of them both times.

You're telling me you wouldn't be stunned if the team lost to one of them?

Rebel10 wrote:OBF, I have seen every team in our conference play and they are all better than anyone we have beaten with maybe the exception of Wyoming. And if we don't have the right personnel playing we are not going to beat hardly anybody. Are you confident enough to say that if we lose to one or more of those teams that you will stop posting on the board for the rest of the season?

Why in the world would we want him to stop posting? We need more fans not less.

There are like 3 or 4 conference teAms in ags category. We just don't shoot we'll enough or slash well enough to dominate Anyone, other than teams we can out athlete

OhioBrownFan wrote:

Rebel10 wrote:OBF, I have seen every team in our conference play and they are all better than anyone we have beaten with maybe the exception of Wyoming. And if we don't have the right personnel playing we are not going to beat hardly anybody. Are you confident enough to say that if we lose to one or more of those teams that you will stop posting on the board for the rest of the season?

If you spot me a loss to anyone of those teams on the road, then yes. I mean, even Nebraska beat Minnesota at home last year. But yeah, I'd stop posting if you would agree to that. Or I'd do it straight up if you conversely agree to the same bet if SMU beats each of them both times.

You're telling me you wouldn't be stunned if the team lost to one of them?

Spot you a loss? I thought you said they were all gimmes? No, I would not be stunned to lose to any of those teams. They are all pretty athletic from what I have seen and if we can't get our offense on track we are going to have problems with everybody regardless to if we win or lose.

The truth lies somewhere in between the assertions of Rebel10 and OBF.

Say it with me: 18 wins and an NIT berth.