AAC now 5-1

by **SmooBoy** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:20 pm

So there.

by **Rebel10** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:28 pm

Go AAC.

by **CenTXpony** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:39 pm

I was kind of disappointed at first with each teams margins of victory but as I looked at most of the other scores I quickly changed my mind. I don't think I've ever witnessed this many close games within my life (though I'm fairly young). Definitely very few blowouts.

by **LHS81** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:57 pm

4-1 as far as I'm concerned.

by **Big12Mustang** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:06 pm

LHS81 wrote:4-1 as far as I'm concerned.

This
[deleted] the ACC

by **AusTxPony** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:22 pm

As of now A-10 looking highly overrated to me. Does the AAC have the best recod?

by **ParkyPony** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:02 pm

AusTxPony wrote:As of now A-10 looking highly overrated to me. Does the AAC have the best recod?

The AAC at 3-1 that is very good compared to most of the other conferences. Oh, and you are right. the MIGHTY A-10 conference is now.......drum roll........ 2-4. Oh sorry, thanks for playing!

by **AusTxPony** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:11 pm

Now you see what the committee said,that the A10 played those oh so tough OOC games that qualified them over SMU, right? Hope they remember their miscalculations next year.

by **Mustangs35SMU** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:15 pm

AusTxPony wrote:Hope they remember their miscalculations next year.

I won't hold my breath.

by **Smu97186** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:19 pm

The two "major" conferences viewed as second tier to the others were the aac and sec. They are 7-1 combined so far

by **SMU Section F** » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:39 pm

Smu97186 wrote:The two "major" conferences viewed as second tier to the others were the aac and sec. They are 7-1 combined so far

Yeah, the AAC took a bunch of flak but there's been a lot of SEC bashing, too. I'm not a big SEC fan, but they're acquitting themselves quite well so far...

by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:07 am

Smu97186 wrote:The two "major" conferences viewed as second tier to the others were the aac and sec. They are 7-1 combined so far

You could argue the AAC is doing better considering the poor seedings the teams got (ie they're playing higher ranked teams than they really should be). The sec while they didn't get many teams they didn't get hosed as much seeding wise.

by **LA_Mustang** » Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:02 am

Remind me why we're adding Tulane and East Carolina? Tulsa adds a little something, the others don't.

by **jpe747** » Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:49 am

And don't forget an AAC team could win the NIT.

by **sadderbudweiser** » Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:57 am

jpe747 wrote:And don't forget an AAC team could win the NIT.

Hopefully over an ACC team!

AAC now 5-1

AAC now 5-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Re: AAC now 3-1

Who is online