|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by OhioBrownFan » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:19 pm
BYU and NC State are my biggest complaints. At least you can make arguments for most other teams. BYU and NC State, you can't even begin to formulate an argument in favor of them over SMU. Oh and edit your Subject line....should say "twice" at the end. 
-

OhioBrownFan

-
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:25 pm
by bsturman » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:30 pm
Throw Nebraska in that, 19-12 and 1-7 vs top 25. Our resume kills them
Pony up!!!
-
bsturman

-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:24 pm
by ojaipony » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:31 pm
SWEPT a sweet 16. Imagine if Memphis beats UVA tomorrow. I NEVER root for Memphis (and my wife and fatherinlaw are both UVA alums), but I'll be pulling for Memphis in this one.
-
ojaipony

-
- Posts: 8281
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:02 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
by LHS81 » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:50 pm
If Memphis takes out UVA tomorrow, SMU will have 3 wins over Sweet 16. . . [deleted] you Ron Wellman
2015 INDIANAPOLIS OR BUST
-

LHS81

-
- Posts: 3801
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:16 pm
- Location: Arlington,Tx
by Smu97186 » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:59 pm
LHS81 wrote:If Memphis takes out UVA tomorrow, SMU will have 3 wins over Sweet 16. . . [deleted] you Ron Wellman
Either way, we will have played either 5 or 6 games against sweet 16 teams. Weak schedule huh?
-
Smu97186

-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:51 pm
by CoxMustangFan » Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:45 am
Smu97186 wrote:LHS81 wrote:If Memphis takes out UVA tomorrow, SMU will have 3 wins over Sweet 16. . . [deleted] you Ron Wellman
Either way, we will have played either 5 or 6 games against sweet 16 teams. Weak schedule huh?
For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
Pony up!
-

CoxMustangFan

-
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:02 pm
- Location: Frisco, TX
by CalallenStang » Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:49 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:Smu97186 wrote:LHS81 wrote:If Memphis takes out UVA tomorrow, SMU will have 3 wins over Sweet 16. . . [deleted] you Ron Wellman
Either way, we will have played either 5 or 6 games against sweet 16 teams. Weak schedule huh?
For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
KU should have lost to TCU again so we could get in to the tourney
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by Grant Carter » Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:56 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:Smu97186 wrote:LHS81 wrote:If Memphis takes out UVA tomorrow, SMU will have 3 wins over Sweet 16. . . [deleted] you Ron Wellman
Either way, we will have played either 5 or 6 games against sweet 16 teams. Weak schedule huh?
For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
That does highlight the ridiculous of the selection method. Who played the least terrible teams? Basically that is what they are saying they use as the selection criteria.
-
Grant Carter

-
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am
by CoxMustangFan » Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:58 am
CalallenStang wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:Smu97186 wrote: For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
KU should have lost to TCU again so we could get in to the tourney
Just so I'm clear, KU should have lost the 91-69 game or the 95-65 game? You're right though, both were closer than they should have been (but all KU could do is put in walk-ons in the second half).
Pony up!
-

CoxMustangFan

-
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:02 pm
- Location: Frisco, TX
by CoxMustangFan » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:02 am
Grant Carter wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:Smu97186 wrote: For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
That does highlight the ridiculous of the selection method. Who played the least terrible teams? Basically that is what they are saying they use as the selection criteria.
I don't believe there is a focus on the bottom teams, but the whole schedule is considered. Not just the top 10 teams.
Pony up!
-

CoxMustangFan

-
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:02 pm
- Location: Frisco, TX
by Grant Carter » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:11 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:Grant Carter wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:[quote="Smu97186"]
For what has been discussed ~18,000 times, it wasn't the top 8 teams that was a problem, it was the bottom 10-15.
That does highlight the ridiculous of the selection method. Who played the least terrible teams? Basically that is what they are saying they use as the selection criteria.
I don't believe there is a focus on the bottom teams, but the whole schedule is considered. Not just the top 10 teams.[/quote] But if you look at the whole schedule then smu's problem was the poor quality of the worst teams they played.
-
Grant Carter

-
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am
by CalallenStang » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:28 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:Just so I'm clear, KU should have lost the 91-69 game or the 95-65 game? You're right though, both were closer than they should have been (but all KU could do is put in walk-ons in the second half).
It was a joke 
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by FIVE-O-FAN » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:05 am
Anyone know what the advancing teams do for the conference in terms of revenue?
-
FIVE-O-FAN

-
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:55 am
by CoxMustangFan » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:07 am
CalallenStang wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:Just so I'm clear, KU should have lost the 91-69 game or the 95-65 game? You're right though, both were closer than they should have been (but all KU could do is put in walk-ons in the second half).
It was a joke 
I figured...shrug! Just trying to navigate the vitriol that has overtaken so many. You wouldn't think we cheer for one of the 25 or so teams that are still alive, about to play a game at home in front of a sold out crowd (against a pretty good opponent).
Pony up!
-

CoxMustangFan

-
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:02 pm
- Location: Frisco, TX
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
|
|