Page 1 of 4
Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:19 am
by ponyboy
Speaking for myself, I am now at the point where I'm happier with our current situation in the NIT than I would have been had we made the Dance but lost in the first round. So the snub itself is now made up for me.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:20 am
by The PonyGrad
Sure, assuming we lost the first round.

Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:22 am
by SMU15
As Mark Cuban would say, "We ain't done yet!"
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:25 am
by ponyboy
The PonyGrad wrote:Sure, assuming we lost the first round.

Good point. I wouldn't have expected to have done that, so the snub account is not entirely covered. But this sting has found a nice salve. This is great fun.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:38 am
by stl.pony
Last night was my favorite game all year ... We walked out of the stadium on a MONDAY NIGHT at 10:15 and the energy was still electric.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:19 pm
by 78pony
Agreed stl.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:23 pm
by mustang1992
stl.pony wrote:Last night was my favorite game all year ... We walked out of the stadium on a MONDAY NIGHT at 10:15 and the energy was still electric.
This
Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:36 pm
by Dooby
I will say we may look back in a year and say the snub was the best thing that could have happened to SMU basketball.
SMU was a a story. The snub was a story. We got 3 more home games.
The team plays better at home and we can all agree this team had a fragile psyche going into post-season play.
Like Bob Knight said years ago, the NIT is a good tournament for a young, inexperienced, but talented team.
The snub will also motivate the team next year and everyone will know to LEAVE NO DOUBT every game.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:38 pm
by Dukie
Dooby wrote:I will say we may look back in a year and say the snub was the best thing that could have happened to SMU basketball.
SMU was a a story. The snub was a story. We got 3 more home games.
The team plays better at home and we can all agree this team had a fragile psyche going into post-season play.
Like Bob Knight said years ago, the NIT is a good tournament for a young, inexperienced, but talented team.
The snub will also motivate the team next year and everyone will know to LEAVE NO DOUBT every game.
+1
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:38 pm
by mustangxc
I would still prefer an NCAA tournament bid even if it meant getting bounced in the first round (ie the play in game).
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:53 pm
by mrydel
mustangxc wrote:I would still prefer an NCAA tournament bid even if it meant getting bounced in the first round (ie the play in game).
I sure felt this way last week but I am sliding over to Dooby's line of thinking. Next year will be different but this year, as far as publicity and program awareness, we could not ask for more. We may not be at the big dance but we are getting to enjoy the limo drive.
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:13 pm
by sadderbudweiser
I was as pissed off and frustrated as anyone after the selections but never, not for a second, did I doubt that there could be serious benefits to the invitation and the seed we were given.
Now come visit me in NY LB!!
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:19 pm
by Smerkins
I have just kept reminding myself that when the season started out I was calling us a "fringe tournament team". I thought we would be lucky to win 2 out of our 8 games with the top of the AAC. We outperformed those expectations, and for that I am a happy camper.
I have really enjoyed these extra games at Moody.
I'm pretty sad that in about a week I have to wait until November to watch these guys play again
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:26 pm
by Harry0569
mustangxc wrote:I would still prefer an NCAA tournament bid even if it meant getting bounced in the first round (ie the play in game).
Agreed
Re: Subjective Satisfaction Meter

Posted:
Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:46 pm
by mustangxc
mrydel wrote:mustangxc wrote:I would still prefer an NCAA tournament bid even if it meant getting bounced in the first round (ie the play in game).
I sure felt this way last week but I am sliding over to Dooby's line of thinking. Next year will be different but this year, as far as publicity and program awareness, we could not ask for more. We may not be at the big dance but we are getting to enjoy the limo drive.
The sting of being left out has worn off, but if you think winning the NIT is better than making the NCAA tournament I don't know what to tell you. BTW I say this as a general statement, not particularly to you mrydel.