austinponie wrote:Schedule rundown as follows, emphasis on common opponents/ NCAA tourney teams:
Initially, I'm more impressed with Cal - although I don't possess a high basketball IQ.
Clemson, however, has certainly played some tough teams. They're considered "overachieving".
Wins:
Temple
Duke (split: one win, one loss)
Wake Forest (split)
Fla. State (split)
Losses:
Arkansas (close)
Syracuse (badly)
Virginia (close)
Pitt X 2
North Carolina (badly)
Should be excited to play in New York -need to acclimate away from Moody and prove we're a road team, too...
Methinks we win with some pucker action. Need to hit free throws...
Cal has better athletes top to bottom than Clemson. Clemson plays better defense start to finish. As mentioned, our biggest problem is an occasional swoon on offense. It can doom us or allow another team (see that second Wake game and especially first FSU game) to catch back up.
We always lose to UNC in Chapel Hill ... it's an amazing streak when you stop to look at it. I can't look at it without wanting to throw up, however.
He left off UMass, which was a Top 25 team most of the year. They were too stout inside early in the year. The UNC loss triggered their 12-game win streak. Always happy to do our part for the ACC.
Arkansas was early, and Syracuse was on the tail end of a 5-of-6 ACC road death march. We also couldn't hit from the wings to save our soul in that game (see the lack of consistent offense that has bedeviled us at times). Pitt Game 1 was too physical for us. Pitt game 2 was the game the refs gave PItt a tying basket after the light came on to end the game, and we just couldn't get back up in time to win in OT. Virginia, Landry Nnoko was out with the flu and we trailed by 1 with a minute to go.
All in all, we over performed for a team expected to finish 14th in the conference, and like y'all we're proud of our guys. The neutral court may make the difference for one of us.
Take care!