PonyFans.com

will be on campus tomorrow to watch practice. It will be interesting to see what he tweets about our guys. He is in FW today, so the bar will be low.

He's always been good to us. Looking forward to his observations

“@JonRothstein: Greetings from Dallas! Here for SMU practice. Mustangs are the team to beat in the AAC. http://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/ ... 18/photo/1”

“@JonRothstein: Palpable buzz out of SMU surrounding Ben Moore. Is capable of playing all five positions on the floor. Breakout sophomore year ahead.”

“@JonRothstein: Virginia Tech transfer Ben Emelogu is going to be a factor for SMU. Has same body type as URI's Jared Terrell. Physical, rugged player.”

“@JonRothstein: The one thing SMU is truly lacking? A legitimate backup point guard behind Nic Moore. Veteran floor general means everything to Mustangs.”

“@JonRothstein: Larry Brown told @CBSSports there is no update regarding Markus Kennedy's eligibility status. Still TBD for start of season.”

“@JonRothstein: Three guys that all look better for SMU? Yanick Moreira, Sterling Brown, Keith Frazier. 2nd year in program will be much more productive.”

“@JonRothstein: Early prediction on SMU starting five (at full strength) --- Nic Moore, Justin Martin, Ben Moore, Markus Kennedy, Yanick Moreira....”

“@JonRothstein: SMU is a Top 15 team, but Mustangs have their work cut out early. Travel to Gonzaga, IU, + Michigan. Host Ark + Wyoming. Could lose all 5.”

Don't think we lose all 5... and we are top 15. Contradiction

Interesting that he thinks Ben will start (even if MK is eligible).

stangsup4 wrote:Interesting that he thinks Ben will start (even if MK is eligible).

Sounds like people are really high on him

SMUstangs22 wrote:Don't think we lose all 5... and we are top 15. Contradiction

the word could and the word will have different meanings.

Grant Carter wrote:

SMUstangs22 wrote:Don't think we lose all 5... and we are top 15. Contradiction

the word could and the word will have different meanings.

No....

Well obviously no means no.

mrydel wrote:Well obviously no means no.

Yes

mrydel wrote:Well obviously no means no.

That's what they say.

I assume LB is blowing smoke on MK's eligibility, but maybe there is a glimmer of hope?

DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:

mrydel wrote:Well obviously no means no.

That's what they say.

I assume LB is blowing smoke on MK's eligibility, but maybe there is a glimmer of hope?

prob smoke