Page 1 of 2
Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:16 pmby blackoutpony
The Mustangs have scuffled to road losses against Gonzaga, Indiana and Arkansas with Markus Kennedy out, but he is now back and the Ponies should be much better going forward.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college ... basketball He has us as the highest AAC team. I know it's just his opinion, but it makes me feel a lot better than he has all 3 of our losses in his top 68. Yes, I know this isn't a touny field, but it still makes me feel better
Uconn - 34
Cincy - 59
Gonzaga - 8
Arky - 28
Indiana - 37
Wyoming - 54
TCU - 68
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:32 pmby DiamondM
But ojaipony thinks everyone from Duke is a DELETED. So why would we listen to that DELETED Bilas (one of the best college bball analysts out there)?
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:55 amby Fresno Mustang
the article says arkansas could be the most likely sec team to knock off kentucky, which would be awesome if that happened
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:58 amby mrydel
They beat them twice last year I think.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:04 pmby DanFreibergerForHeisman
mrydel wrote:They beat them twice last year I think.
Yes, they did.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:39 pmby ojaipony
DiamondM wrote:But ojaipony thinks everyone from Duke is a DELETED. So why would we listen to that DELETED Bilas (one of the best college bball analysts out there)?
If you read my post I said everyone I've ever met who went there were [deleted]. Just my experience. Did you go there also? If so, your post just further validates my experience.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:59 pmby East Coast Mustang
ojai isn't wrong here. Not many cool guys from Duke
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:21 pmby gostangs
gotta agree on the Duke thing. Mostly northeastern jack asses and unhappy non-ivy asians.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:07 amby LA_Mustang
gostangs wrote:gotta agree on the Duke thing. Mostly northeastern jack asses and unhappy non-ivy asians.
Kinda like SMU is just a bunch of rich, white snobs? Stereotypes suck.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:18 amby couch 'em
SMU by and large IS a bunch of rich white (and very spanish Latin american) snobs. Every school has its positives and negatives
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 7:46 amby StallionsModelT
couch 'em wrote:SMU by and large IS a bunch of rich white (and very spanish Latin american) snobs. Every school has its positives and negatives
I guess you haven't spent much time on campus lately. Cool 1985 stereotype though brah.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:00 amby mustangxc
StallionsModelT wrote:couch 'em wrote:SMU by and large IS a bunch of rich white (and very spanish Latin american) snobs. Every school has its positives and negatives
I guess you haven't spent much time on campus lately. Cool 1985 stereotype though brah.
Actually, that's how it was up until 2003 when I graduated. I can't speak about the last 10 years.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:39 amby fifty
I see the snob stereotype today. I wasn't around in the 80-90s to compare. Maybe it's the university park/smu adults and not so much the students that gives me that feel...
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 9:03 amby PonyKai
SMU's stereotype is why I've always wondered how faculty could be biased against athletes. It would be so much easier and understandable for them to just hate the general student body.
Re: Bilas Index - SMU #31
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2014 9:58 amby PonySnob
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:SMU's stereotype is why I've always wondered how faculty could be biased against athletes. It would be so much easier and understandable for them to just hate the general student body.
Lots of them do.......