jc500's legitimacy cannot be challenged

Gents,
I appreciate the criticism of the former threads authored by me about the Pony's NCAA tourney hopes. My points are extremely powerful, and some react negatively to them at first glance. However, my credentials and knowledge of the SMU hoops program are impeccable.
First, abezontar is justified in questioning my credentials. BUT HE IS WRONG IN HIS ASSUMPTIONS.
I possess legitmate credentials which justify my Pony Hoops bragadoccio. For instance, in 97-98 I covered the Men's Hoops program for the Daily Campus, where I served as Associate Sports Editor. (I'm sure the DC is online. Check it out.)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming the legitimacy of what is essentially a jack rag publication. However, in the process of covering the team (which entails attending practices, interviewing Dement and other assistant coaches regularly, talking to other coaches around the league, etc.), you get a real sense of a coach's abilities both in motivation and pure hoops knowledge.
Let me tell you, Mike Dement is a dedicated professional who deserves the respect of the fans. His practice-time intensity is the stuff that legends are made of. And his game time coaching decisions are consistently excellent.
NCPony makes a good point - merely coaching under Coach K doesn't mean Dement is a good coach. But that fact, combined with the inherent sense of discipline and attention to detail in Dement's coaching style prove his abilities.
Further, I would like to think I have a knack for telling when someone is expressing a sincere opinion. In that light, there were many in the WAC coaching fraternity that praised the ability of Mike Dement. In particular, Bill Self (then the Tulsa HC, now the HC at Illinois) had the highest of praises for Dement and the competitiveness of the Pony program despite its apathetic environment and lackluster talent. (And those comments were made when Jeryl Sasser was a Pony.)
The bottom line is that SMU is fortunate to have a coach of Dement's caliber. Certainly, Dement has had a good deal of time, and the program might ought to be in a better position by now. But there are factors beyond Dement's control that have inhibited progress.
For one, the WAC is now a garbage conference. With the creation of the Mountain West, and the departure of UNLV and Utah from the WAC, recruiting became that much more difficult.
In addition, the Athletic Department is not committed to doing the things necessary to turn a program around. In order to attract quality non-conference opponents, schools like SMU usually have to fork over gate receipts or pay a hefty fee just to play a top-caliber team. The SMU athletic department has not been willing to do this.
Dement, through his coaching contacts and the contacts of old SWC pros in the AD, has been able to secure some good in-state non-conference games. But outside the Wake Forest game, good non-conference opponents are not going to come play or even host SMU because of the AD's stinginess.
Also, I don't like to get upset with people. As much as I've thrown a lot of smack around this board in the last few days, I'm really not a negative person. But this constant, unsubstantiated abuse from Pony_Fan has become almost unbearable in its total lack of truth and its general pathetic nature.
PF, please prove yourself by stepping up to the plate with something more than a two sentence "zinger" or the common, hackneyed complaints of a disgruntled fan who knows absolutely NOTHING about the how the game really operates.
PF, your legitimacy is on the line. Show some guts.
Step up.
Also, Joey bag of donuts is my brother. My posting regarding the legend of Mark Buynoski was an inside joke. (See the Return to Glory thread). I apologize for subjecting the SMU Hoops community to that tyrade. But that comedic twist in no way effects the legitimacy of my comments regarding SMU hoops.
Finally, CPC is correct in his assessment of my spelling abilities. However, I do not proofread my comments simply because my time is too valuable. I simply make them and trust that the reader understands my point. I apologize in advance for any spelling errors to be committed.
Having said that, CPC is a huge tool. I actually acknowledged my spelling error for Purdue's head coach and CPC still felt the need to point it out.
We can only imagine CPC sitting at his cubicle, maticulously proofreading his postings for fear that he makes a casual spelling error.
CPC, in my mind, is approaching a level of patheticness formerly obtained only by Pony_Fan.
I'm out
I appreciate the criticism of the former threads authored by me about the Pony's NCAA tourney hopes. My points are extremely powerful, and some react negatively to them at first glance. However, my credentials and knowledge of the SMU hoops program are impeccable.
First, abezontar is justified in questioning my credentials. BUT HE IS WRONG IN HIS ASSUMPTIONS.
I possess legitmate credentials which justify my Pony Hoops bragadoccio. For instance, in 97-98 I covered the Men's Hoops program for the Daily Campus, where I served as Associate Sports Editor. (I'm sure the DC is online. Check it out.)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming the legitimacy of what is essentially a jack rag publication. However, in the process of covering the team (which entails attending practices, interviewing Dement and other assistant coaches regularly, talking to other coaches around the league, etc.), you get a real sense of a coach's abilities both in motivation and pure hoops knowledge.
Let me tell you, Mike Dement is a dedicated professional who deserves the respect of the fans. His practice-time intensity is the stuff that legends are made of. And his game time coaching decisions are consistently excellent.
NCPony makes a good point - merely coaching under Coach K doesn't mean Dement is a good coach. But that fact, combined with the inherent sense of discipline and attention to detail in Dement's coaching style prove his abilities.
Further, I would like to think I have a knack for telling when someone is expressing a sincere opinion. In that light, there were many in the WAC coaching fraternity that praised the ability of Mike Dement. In particular, Bill Self (then the Tulsa HC, now the HC at Illinois) had the highest of praises for Dement and the competitiveness of the Pony program despite its apathetic environment and lackluster talent. (And those comments were made when Jeryl Sasser was a Pony.)
The bottom line is that SMU is fortunate to have a coach of Dement's caliber. Certainly, Dement has had a good deal of time, and the program might ought to be in a better position by now. But there are factors beyond Dement's control that have inhibited progress.
For one, the WAC is now a garbage conference. With the creation of the Mountain West, and the departure of UNLV and Utah from the WAC, recruiting became that much more difficult.
In addition, the Athletic Department is not committed to doing the things necessary to turn a program around. In order to attract quality non-conference opponents, schools like SMU usually have to fork over gate receipts or pay a hefty fee just to play a top-caliber team. The SMU athletic department has not been willing to do this.
Dement, through his coaching contacts and the contacts of old SWC pros in the AD, has been able to secure some good in-state non-conference games. But outside the Wake Forest game, good non-conference opponents are not going to come play or even host SMU because of the AD's stinginess.
Also, I don't like to get upset with people. As much as I've thrown a lot of smack around this board in the last few days, I'm really not a negative person. But this constant, unsubstantiated abuse from Pony_Fan has become almost unbearable in its total lack of truth and its general pathetic nature.
PF, please prove yourself by stepping up to the plate with something more than a two sentence "zinger" or the common, hackneyed complaints of a disgruntled fan who knows absolutely NOTHING about the how the game really operates.
PF, your legitimacy is on the line. Show some guts.
Step up.
Also, Joey bag of donuts is my brother. My posting regarding the legend of Mark Buynoski was an inside joke. (See the Return to Glory thread). I apologize for subjecting the SMU Hoops community to that tyrade. But that comedic twist in no way effects the legitimacy of my comments regarding SMU hoops.
Finally, CPC is correct in his assessment of my spelling abilities. However, I do not proofread my comments simply because my time is too valuable. I simply make them and trust that the reader understands my point. I apologize in advance for any spelling errors to be committed.
Having said that, CPC is a huge tool. I actually acknowledged my spelling error for Purdue's head coach and CPC still felt the need to point it out.
We can only imagine CPC sitting at his cubicle, maticulously proofreading his postings for fear that he makes a casual spelling error.
CPC, in my mind, is approaching a level of patheticness formerly obtained only by Pony_Fan.
I'm out