Page 1 of 2

Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:16 pm
by PonyTime
Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:18 pm
by couch 'em
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.

Hookers aren't an academic violation so no post season ban

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:32 pm
by hoopmanx
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:36 pm
by PonyTime
hoopmanx wrote:
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


You're telling me everyone at Lou was on the same page for 5 years and at UNC for almost 20? Excluding the Hookers, of course.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 11:11 pm
by Mestengo
I only had eyes for you

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 11:12 pm
by JasonB
hoopmanx wrote:
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


Isn't there a chance that people were naive as to what Malagi was up to? We have been naïve on the football side with assistant coaches before where we truly didn't have a clue of what was going on behind the scenes..

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 1:50 am
by SoCal_Pony
hoopmanx wrote:
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


Very legitimate question, PonyTime.

Sounds like the Keystone Kops.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 1:52 am
by SoCal_Pony
PonyTime wrote:
hoopmanx wrote:
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


You're telling me everyone at Lou was on the same page for 5 years and at UNC for almost 20? Excluding the Hookers, of course.


Hoopmanx, care to answer?

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 7:13 am
by PonyKris89
I thought I read somewhere, that KF was very uncomfortable with the situation when he finally became aware of the situation, then had the conference call with he, the AdMN Assistant and Malagi.
If that is true, then we probably felt like it was imminent that the situation would get to Investigators in a very short time.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 7:25 am
by couch 'em
PonyKris89 wrote:I thought I read somewhere, that KF was very uncomfortable with the situation when he finally became aware of the situation, then had the conference call with he, the AdMN Assistant and Malagi.
If that is true, then we probably felt like it was imminent that the situation would get to Investigators in a very short time.

If he was uncomfortable why wouldn't he just take his own class? Or at least ask what the class is about

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:32 am
by hoopmanx
First off, da Ville and Tarheel nation are entrenched and have their protocol in place. We knew nothing of big time hoops and in 10 days time, cut the entire team and got a commitment from Josiah Turner. Do you see Tarheel assistants rolling on Instagram about their shoe game? The notion of SMU as SnapBack u and #wheelsup, all while looking for LBs next HOF gorilla is hysterical. Don't get me wrong, I loved it, but it was brash at the very least. Essentially, we flew too close to the sun w no infrastructure or executive directive on how to handle such issues. For one, If you're employing a filthy staff, don't self report. Its cover up time and you bury as much as you can.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:01 pm
by smusportspage
So, the other schools that have the 'infrastructure' don't self report? Interesting.

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:06 pm
by hoopmanx
JasonB wrote:
hoopmanx wrote:
PonyTime wrote:Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


Isn't there a chance that people were naive as to what Malagi was up to? We have been naïve on the football side with assistant coaches before where we truly didn't have a clue of what was going on behind the scenes..


A fish rots from the head down.

Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 4:11 pm
by lwjr
hoopmanx wrote:
JasonB wrote:
hoopmanx wrote:[quote="PonyTime"]Did Louiville turn themselves in the first time they had hookers for recruits and the recruits dads at a hooker party? The second time? The 20th time?

Did UNC turn themselves in when one player took a made up course? Two? 1,500?

No...they just kept it quiet an won championships.

If Hoopmanx is correct that we were as "filthy as can be", why would we report anything?

I don't get it.


Nobody is on the same page.


Isn't there a chance that people were naive as to what Malagi was up to? We have been naïve on the football side with assistant coaches before where we truly didn't have a clue of what was going on behind the scenes..


A fish rots from the head down.[/quote]

Were you one of the writers for the Godfather trilogies?

Re: Why did we turn ourselves in?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:12 pm
by hoopmanx
lwjr wrote:
Were you one of the writers for the Godfather trilogies?


I can't take credit for Godfather 3