UNC article.

by **Terry Webster** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:52 am

Found this article this morning. Geez, SMU pales in comparison. Wonder how the ncaa will handle this.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/l ... ml?ref=yfp

by **Rebel10** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 7:15 am

They may have started looking atb these violations before the new rules were in place.

by **Arkpony** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:02 am

Indicates case won't be resolved before NEXT SPRING!

by **gostangs** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:50 am

because UNC is purposely delaying things while they make a run at the tournament with a really good team. HMMMMM....who would have ever thought of that?

by **smupony94** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:53 am

Has anyone heard if we are appealing?

by **StallionsModelT** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:26 am

smupony94 wrote:Has anyone heard if we are appealing?

Yep. It's part of the "Pony Promise".

by **1983 Cotton Bowl** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:31 am

These allegations are a colossal [deleted]-storm for UNC Chapel Hill, that have potential ramifications well beyond whatever the NCAA might do to their men's hoop program. So hoops may skate. . .who knows. . .but the effects of this scandal at UNC will linger for a long, long time.

by **Rebel10** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:36 am

gostangs wrote:because UNC is purposely delaying things while they make a run at the tournament with a really good team. HMMMMM....who would have ever thought of that?

They should not do that. They should just take their punishment and get it over with because with NCAA violations hanging over their head the past couple of years they have not been able to recruit over the past couple of class and currently can't recruit.

by **EastStang** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:08 am

This goes to their certifications as a University. They could lose Dept. of Education funding because of this. A whole lot at stake for them over and above, the basketball team going to the Final Four and Roy Williams getting a 9 game suspension.

by **ponydawg** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:10 am

Rebel10 wrote:
gostangs wrote:because UNC is purposely delaying things while they make a run at the tournament with a really good team. HMMMMM....who would have ever thought of that?

They should not do that. They should just take their punishment and get it over with because with NCAA violations hanging over their head the past couple of years they have not been able to recruit over the past couple of class and currently can't recruit.

I'd say comparing where UNC and SMU are currently at and the history of success for both basketball teams is a very fair comparison. Same number of banners hanging.

by **Rebel10** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:51 pm

Don't think I mentioned SMU.

by **Puckhead48E** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 1:26 pm

"We have no policies in place to accurately enforce such excessive but indirect cases of academic issued with potential benefit implications in regard to the athletics department. Therefore, due to exceptional cooperation throughout this investigation, the NCAA has placed UNC-CH on probation for 5 years, reduced women's BB scholarships by 2 per year for that period, and will use this information to create a new set of regulations and enforcement protocols to ensure this doesn't happen again."

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

by **Puckhead48E** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 1:28 pm

Oh, I forgot to mention, they will also increase our postseason ban to 2 years as a result of these findings.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

by **PonyTime** » Thu Oct 29, 2015 11:16 am

Read somewhere else the following re: UNC...

New commitment to UNC says he was assured by Williams UNC basketball will not be punished. How is he so sure?

by **LA_Mustang** » Thu Oct 29, 2015 11:20 am

Of course they won't be. All they did is give out fake grades for fake classes for years to athletes. Where is the harm in that??

UNC article.

UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Re: UNC article.

Who is online