Page 1 of 1
ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 1:34 pm
by LA_Mustang
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 3:19 pm
by PonyKai
Good question to ask since Larry's suspension ends in a day and Jank is 8-0 already . . .
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 3:48 pm
by Rebel10
If Cuse plays any top 20 teams during their 9 game head coach suspension it would be harder imo.
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:24 pm
by JasonB
If they think Cuse is going to get any consideration for a loss when Boeheim was suspended, they have another thing coming. The NCAA will do anything to keep Syracuse out or give them a poor seed/bracket in order to punish them for appealing the ban and suspension.
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:30 pm
by Rebel10
JasonB wrote:If they think Cuse is going to get any consideration for a loss when Boeheim was suspended, they have another thing coming. The NCAA will do anything to keep Syracuse out or give them a poor seed/bracket in order to punish them for appealing the ban and suspension.
Mark Emmert is not over the selection committee. That would be college presidents and AD's mostly. So conspiracy theory not possible in that particular case.
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:34 pm
by Rebel10
Come to think of it the Wisconsin coach is really coaching to see of they want to keep him or not to some degree so he may have the toughest job.
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:42 am
by sadderbudweiser
BEST fill-in job?
No contest.
ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:38 am
by Treadway21
Rebel10 wrote:JasonB wrote:If they think Cuse is going to get any consideration for a loss when Boeheim was suspended, they have another thing coming. The NCAA will do anything to keep Syracuse out or give them a poor seed/bracket in order to punish them for appealing the ban and suspension.
Mark Emmert is not over the selection committee. That would be college presidents and AD's mostly. So conspiracy theory not possible in that particular case.
Yeah. It's not like he doesn't have a phone or ever see the committee members. Not saying the conspiracy exists but it is naive not to think it's not possible - especially with the NCAA.
Re: ESPN: toughest fill-in job - Cuse, SMU or Wisconsin?

Posted:
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:52 am
by Rebel10
Treadway21 wrote:Rebel10 wrote:JasonB wrote:If they think Cuse is going to get any consideration for a loss when Boeheim was suspended, they have another thing coming. The NCAA will do anything to keep Syracuse out or give them a poor seed/bracket in order to punish them for appealing the ban and suspension.
Mark Emmert is not over the selection committee. That would be college presidents and AD's mostly. So conspiracy theory not possible in that particular case.
Yeah. It's not like he doesn't have a phone or ever see the committee members. Not saying the conspiracy exists but it is naive not to think it's not possible - especially with the NCAA.
You are missing the point. Point is Emmert does not control the presidents and AD's. 1st Cuse did not appeal the post season ban, they self imposed a post season ban last year so there was nothing to appeal. 2nd Cuse getting the 9 game suspension move back means nothing. Just like Kansas won't be punished for appealing and winning the Diallo situation. And Self went off publicly on the NCAA on that issue.