Pitt board
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:02 amPage 1 of 2
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:04 pmTop 40-team lol. We're easily Top 25.
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:17 pmI bet Gardner-Webb gives them a good game tonight.
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:37 pmIf we were easily top 25 I think we would be in the top 25
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:18 pmRe: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 7:36 pmSMUstang07 wrote:If we were easily top 25 I think we would be in the top 25
SMU rarely gets any love especially in preseason rankings.
we'll be in the top 25 after we dismantle Pitt
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:43 pmDidn't we play them in a Bowl
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:44 pmBirmingham
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:45 pmCotton
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:47 pmWe have never lost to Pitt in a bowl.
Never lost to them in basketball either.
Never lost to them in basketball either.
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:49 pmPitiful
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:26 am"This isn't UNC, Kentucky, Kansas, or Villanova they're playing, it's SMU. They have a good chance to win this game on talent alone."
These guys have no idea who or what SMU is and it's comical
These guys have no idea who or what SMU is and it's comical
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:31 amIf Stallings is smart and has some shooters, he will allow his team to go "bombs away" from three in this game - just like some of the teams that beat us (or almost beat us - see Kent State) last year.
It remains to be seen if that sort of strategy will work this year. Our first two opponents are not really a good measure.
It remains to be seen if that sort of strategy will work this year. Our first two opponents are not really a good measure.
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:56 amOur perimeter D is longer and more experienced this year. I'll be interested to see if that limits the long bombs.
Re: Pitt board
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:13 pmPonyTime wrote:If Stallings is smart and has some shooters, he will allow his team to go "bombs away" from three in this game - just like some of the teams that beat us (or almost beat us - see Kent State) last year.
It remains to be seen if that sort of strategy will work this year. Our first two opponents are not really a good measure.
Well they shoot a [deleted] ton of 3's so I wouldnt be surprised if that was their gameplan. That and get the ball to Young.