Page 1 of 1

Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:05 pm
by PonyTime
They are sooo gonna skate...

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/louisville-responds-to-ncaas-notice-of-allegations-for-stripper-scandal-arguing-for-leniency-205916630.html

If the NCAA Committee on Infractions rules that Pitino did commit a major violation – a hearing before the COI is expected sometime this spring or summer – he could be subject to a multi-game suspension during the 2017-18 season. In previous seasons, Hall of Fame coaches Jim Boeheim, Larry Brown and Jim Calhoun have been suspended for part of a season.

In its response to the NOA, Louisville said, “The University believes that Coach Pitino fostered a culture of NCAA compliance within the basketball program and exercised appropriate supervisory oversight of McGee. McGee’s furtive conduct was not detectable by reasonable monitoring practices, as McGee purposefully intended to avoid detection.”

^^^^^^^^^^
Couldn't we have used the above clause to our advantage regarding KF? Assistant coach's conduct was not detectable by reasonable monitoring practices?

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:41 pm
by mrydel
Don't the rules now say the HC is responsible regardless?

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:58 pm
by smupony94
Yes why they are saying past rules apply

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:59 pm
by mrydel
Then can we go back to the past rules we had of playing players?

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:41 pm
by CalallenStang
smupony94 wrote:Yes why they are saying past rules apply


Does it have to do with the date the violations occurred?

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:46 pm
by Rebel10
Wonder if the infractions were committed before the new rules were in place.

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:47 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
Rebel10 wrote:Wonder if the infractions were committed before the new rules were in place.

Thought they were after ours

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:49 pm
by sadderbudweiser
CalallenStang wrote:
smupony94 wrote:Yes why they are saying past rules apply


Does it have to do with the date the violations occurred?



No. it's because the hookers were ugly.

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:09 pm
by SMUstangs22
Our infractions were before new rules I believe

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:15 pm
by Hoop Fan
Wonder what is keeping McGee loyal while pitino continues to publicly throw him under the bus. Pitino is acting way too holy, it's disgusting and BS.

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:25 pm
by Rebel10
DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:
Rebel10 wrote:Wonder if the infractions were committed before the new rules were in place.

Thought they were after ours


They were reported after our but I don't know if they were committed before the new rules were effective.

Re: Louisville

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:28 pm
by Rebel10
Hoop Fan wrote:Wonder what is keeping McGee loyal while pitino continues to publicly throw him under the bus.

Same thing that is keeping the young lady that worked with KF silent, money.