SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:28 pmhttps://mobile.twitter.com/marchmadness ... 62/photo/1
I didn't think Minnesota would be ranked at 18.
I didn't think Minnesota would be ranked at 18.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:28 pmRe: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:39 pmMaybe if they would have counted today's game...
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:08 pmStupid golden gophers...
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:13 pmstill mad at them from the NIT in NYC
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:17 pmby the way - if you switch Iowa state and SMU then we would be likely playing Purdue - which is not a good match up for us.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:22 pmYou win this thing by winning games... not getting the highest seed.
Just numbers!!
Just numbers!!
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:24 pmgostangs wrote:still mad at them from the NIT in NYC
Especially his daddy calling his timeouts for him
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:31 pmDanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:gostangs wrote:still mad at them from the NIT in NYC
Especially his daddy calling his timeouts for him
And that dude stepped OB.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:59 pmgostangs wrote:by the way - if you switch Iowa state and SMU then we would be likely playing Purdue - which is not a good match up for us.
That is in the second round. And I think Baylor is better than Purdue. But I wouldn't mind playing either because it would mean SMU would have won the first game. I am focused on the first game. Beat the Friars/Trojans.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:08 pmRebel10 wrote:gostangs wrote:by the way - if you switch Iowa state and SMU then we would be likely playing Purdue - which is not a good match up for us.
That is in the second round. And I think Baylor is better than Purdue. But I wouldn't mind playing either because it would mean SMU would have won the first game. I am focused on the first game. Beat the Friars/Trojans.
Focus on the first game. Tourney teams who don't shoot the three well enough or often enough eventually pay. That is what we found out against UCLA two years ago, and Baylor is going to learn that lesson this year.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:11 pmBI agree. And Baylor probably learned that lesson last year when Yale beat them in the tournament.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:41 pmI get the people that say you gotta win games and seeds don't matter but this is horsesht. Getting a 4-5 seed drastically increases your odds to go deep as your matchups are better each step of the way. Well always be the top of the seed line and never the last one who got overseeded.
Re: SMU missed a 5 seed by 1 spot
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:14 pmSMUstang07 wrote:I get the people that say you gotta win games and seeds don't matter but this is horsesht. Getting a 4-5 seed drastically increases your odds to go deep as your matchups are better each step of the way. Well always be the top of the seed line and never the last one who got overseeded.
I personally think our matchups and location draw are great. Plenty of opportunity there.
I definitely think we deserved a better seed, but this may work out well for us.