redpony wrote:RGV Pony wrote: How exactly is Hart keeping away 350+ students per game?
I think Jason B covered that in his comment 'That said, they screwed the mob up with the mob version of the reseat a couple of years ago and it hasn't recovered since."
When you take away the enthusiasm. Schedule an OOC that resembles a group of high school teams
and then half of them kicks your butt it is hard for students to put bball ahead of other priorities.
OOH- what has hart done to encourage student participation at the games???
IMO he has ticked off a lot of students just like he has a lot of formerly loyal alums. But then again, I guess our attendance shows different- right?
I agree with the part of your post re the OOC schedule. Winning as well.
As such, that is handled by the HC, not the admin.
As for encouraging student participation, this year's format was arrived at by discussion with students.
Lets look even to football, which we can also agree leaves something to be desired as to student participation.
This season, with student input a tent exists with food, entertainment, and a place tickets, wrist bands etc.
Free food in the stadium.
DJ in the stadium.
200k for the stables - which again haven't been as smashing as any of us would've hoped, but were put up with student input.
Every Monday, the Athletic staff meets with students. Regular meetings with student government, senate, pres; regular meetings with both the IFC and the alumni advisers of the different fraternities. This is true for both athletic department people and Dr Mmeje, the VP of Student Affairs.
That's off the top of my head.