Sorry you brought up the topic of the Perkins Natatorium, which is my number one issue.
Situation: Ancient facility with only six swimming lanes and no diving well in a dark, former gymnasium. I spent a lot of time in the pool and love the memories, but it is no longer competitive. Our Men's, and now, Women's Swim & Diving Teams compete with facilities less than those for an average Division Three School or a good High School program. Recruiting is handicapped and training four teams - Men and Women Swimming and Diving - limits proper training time as well as it's quality.
My answer and a mail campaign was to combine the needs of the new recreational pool intended for the Dedman Center for Lifetime Sports with the varsity requirements. The new rec pool cost could have been added to funds already ear-marked for a new competitive pool with Swimming Alumni Base ready to step up. The result would have been a very nice aquatic center (50 meters by 25 yards with a diving well) which would have generously served the recreational needs of the student body as well as the Men's and Women's Teams.
But, this approach was dismissed by the Recreational Department. What a missed opportunity. Now, replacing Perkins becomes financially more challenging. Fixing it up would be a half measure by going into the Band Areas, which will be vacated. Hate to see these swim/diving programs not have the means to compete well into the future, especially in light of the unfortunate loss of Men's Track & Field.
The fact that Swim & Diving Teams have been strong for decades is no assurance they will remain that way. Sorry for the core dump! And, at this moment, there is no answer
