|
Improper?Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
18 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Improper?I am not sure of the context in which you ask the question but in football for instance the coaches will offer several more kids than there are scholarships available. If the class fills up, then the offer will not be able to be fulfilled. Of course for the right kid, room will be made, but all things equal it is first come first served.
On the other hand, although it happens occasionally, if you make an offer and then renege, or withdraw a committment after the kid has accepted, your reputation and credibility will be hurt. However, it will be forgotten quickly if the coach wins. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Improper?Interesting take on the issue. I am curious that if the offer is made and then taken away, isn't that fraud? A verbal contract is still binding.
I know my rights, man.
Re: Improper?so if an incoming student athlete that has accepted the offer but decides at the last minute he/she got a better offer somewhere else or just decides not to come, is that fraud? whats your point?
Last edited by ponyplayer on Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Improper?No, the student accepts, enrolls, then get's a bill for full tuition. In your scenario If a student athlete has signed a letter of intent and changes their mind then the coach has the option of not releasing the player. There are repercussions.
Last edited by Oldkeeper on Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
I know my rights, man.
Re: Improper?In your initial scenario, has the student signed a LOI?
The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney? Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
Re: Improper?Happens every year at every school. Just like kids can change their minds, so can a school, although most coaches won't without considerable reason. There is mrydel's argument that the coach's reputation will be "hurt," but at the same time, most coaches will explain to a HS coach why an offer was pulled. There also are countless scenarios in which a kid is offered, and told "look, we're going to offer three other players at your position — the first two to accept will get the scholarships." A lot of student-athletes misread that qualifier, thinking the scholarship always will be there, and therefore can get upset when it doesn't turn out the way they envision.
Once a Mustang, ALWAYS a Mustang!
Re: Improper?The Letter of Intent should denote the scholarship percentage. If this percentage is not honored once the student is enrolled, I would consider that a breach of contract (assuming the student did nothing to have his/her scholarship revoked).
Re: Improper?
I would agree with this. Pulling an offer is not the same as pulling a scholarship, There would have to be some just cause for pulling the scholarship as we witnessed last year. Some of the ones pulled held up and some did not. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Improper?That's my read on it. And in some sports (like basketball/soccer) scholarships are renewable at the discretion of the school on an annual basis. In some circumstances coaches have been known to not renew a scholarship for an under-performing player, but this is very rare because the coach then gets a bad rep among the players in the sport and the high school coaches, usually there is something more like a morals issue or an academic issue.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
Re: Improper?
There is if there is a letter of intent involved (see above). Year to year, as mentioned, is a negotiable contract. The coach does not have to renew or he/she can increase or decrease. I know my rights, man.
Re: Improper?
I was referring to pre-LOI revocation. I don't disagree that it would be improper after the parties have signed their LOI. Derail the Frogs!
18 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
|