Page 1 of 1

Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:14 pm
by mustangbill67

Re: Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:47 am
by EastStang
Looks like McClemments has to decide whether to play the young studs or go with the returning players who had a bad season last year. How do you keep two freshmen All-Americans off the field? Its going to be interesting. Is this another rebuilding year?

Re: Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:10 pm
by mustangbill67
Looking at the stats for the recent exibition game, it looks like several of the freshman are starters.

Re: Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:14 pm
by redpony
With all this talent and reasonable coaching there is no valid reason why this team should not finish in the top 10 this year.

GO PONIES!!!
MUSTANG MANIA LIVES :)

Re: Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:00 pm
by mathman
redpony wrote:With all this talent and reasonable coaching there is no valid reason why this team should not finish in the top 10 this year.

GO PONIES!!!
MUSTANG MANIA LIVES :)

You may be on to something.

Re: Men's Soccer Position by Position Review

PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:45 pm
by Roach
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. The win over Creighton was enormous — that's a really good team — but there are still some really good teams left on the schedule.

We were #18 in last week's NSCAA poll. Creighton was #16. Good win (away from home — neutral field).

Tulsa is third in the country, and we haven't played them yet. I saw them play when they were in town for a tournament, and they're loaded. South Carolina is getting top 25 votes and always is strong. UAB plays us well and Kentucky is a strong program.

Not saying we won't beat any of those teams — even Tulsa — but I'm not ready to go with a top 10 ranking just yet. (Hoping for one though!)