mrydel wrote:Dooby wrote:Not until a bowl game, baby!
If those are the terms, what do we get to replace her? It had better be good.
You, JT and Stallion in thong Speedos
|
More GWB Library News (depositions from Bushes?)Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
37 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
When I wear my speedo I am compared to a pear with a rubber band around it. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
I will be replacing one SMU grad with another. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
This could get interesting: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 220c2.html
Letter to DMN:
Just how did SMU allegedly "bully" Mr. Vodicka? Did it involve brass knuckles? Did SMU President R. Gerald Turner perhaps get in Mr. Vodicka's face? Was the air let out of the poor man's tires? While Mr. Vodicka has every right to bring suit, I'm amused at the media's lack of journalistic curiousity about this man. Will Mr. Vodicka ever receive a full-scale "media anal examination," similar to those administered Joe the Plumber and Sarah Palin? Here are some suggestions for journalistic inquiry that have no doubt never crossed you guys' fertile minds: 1) What are Mr. Vodicka's political views and affiliations? 2) Who is financing Mr. Vodicka's pursuit? 3) Does Mr. Vodicka have a criminal record? 4) Has he ever not paid his taxes or had trouble with the IRS? 5) Has Mr. Vodicka had any contacts with high-level Democrat operatives in the last year? 6) Has Mr. Vodicka ever been involved in any embarassing situation that has never been made public? 7) Does he have children? Have they ever been in any kind of trouble? Is Vodicka married/divorced? If divorced, what are the details? I don't know the answers to any of these questions, but I'm quite certain if Mr. Vodicka were seeking to shakedown/embarrass a former Democrat president, they would indeed be asked.
I do know the answers to most of the above and it isn't looking to good for the con-man shakedown lawyer. His own attorney should know by now, you sleep with a dog with fleas, you get up with fleas.
37 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests |
|