|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
General discussion: anything you want to talk about!
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by RebStang » Fri Jun 13, 2014 11:10 pm
East Coast Mustang wrote:I'm a huge sports fan and I couldn't tell you who won the CWS last year. No one cares outside of the teams that are actually in it.
That's the funny thing about college baseball... the programs that actually field a team and make a real effort at being competitive tend to develop very intense fanbases. Those who don't have teams or have teams and don't really try to be competitive have fanbases that "don't care" about college baseball. Prime example? Alabama in the SEC. Their fans all claim they don't care about baseball. Why? Because their program doesn't put any money into the sport and they're usually pretty bad. If they have a good team for a couple years in a row they'll fill their stadium and have 20,000 people claiming to be die hard college baseball fans.
-

RebStang

-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:45 pm
- Location: Birmingham, Al
by Big12Mustang » Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:10 am
Junior wrote:smusportspage wrote:No kidding. Hate that little league crap with Aluminum bats....play real baseball. Go with wood and you might have something.
this isn't Cape Cod. use aluminum.
It's Aluminium 
-

Big12Mustang

-
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
by DanFreibergerForHeisman » Sat Jun 14, 2014 7:52 am
RebStang wrote:That's the funny thing about college baseball... the programs that actually field a team and make a real effort at being competitive tend to develop very intense fanbases. Those who don't have teams or have teams and don't really try to be competitive have fanbases that "don't care" about college baseball.
That is true for just about every college sport. Look at Moody this year. Hell, look at all of the people who came out of the woodwork for SMU men's golf this spring.
Shake It Off Moody
-

DanFreibergerForHeisman

-
- Posts: 16485
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
-
by NavyCrimson » Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:58 pm
PEOPLE LOVE WINNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if SMU took on baseball & GOT SERIOUS about it, they'd be there to support BASEBALL, too. It's not rocket science.
The fact of the matter is that SMU never was serious about baseball when they had baseball.
Last edited by NavyCrimson on Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!
For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
-

NavyCrimson

-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)
by Greenwich Pony » Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:02 pm
I'd just be happy if we took football seriously.
Support the Commitment! We're all SMU Mustangs fans- we should all be committed!
-
Greenwich Pony

-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Westport, CT, USA
by NavyCrimson » Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:13 pm
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good one!
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!
For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
-

NavyCrimson

-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)
by PonySnob » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:25 pm
Greenwich Pony wrote:I'd just be happy if we took football seriously.
2015 season...............
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMU2007 » Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:55 pm
PonySnob wrote:Greenwich Pony wrote:I'd just be happy if we took football seriously.
2015 season...............
And then just a couple more for everyone to learn the playbook... Watch out!!
-

SMU2007

-
- Posts: 5561
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am
by Big12Mustang » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:51 pm
NavyCrimson wrote:PEOPLE LOVE WINNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if SMU took on baseball & GOT SERIOUS about it, they'd be there to support BASEBALL, too. It's not rocket science.
The fact of the matter is that SMU never was serious about baseball when they had baseball.
Let's get our football team to start winning more than 10 games per year before we even think about adding baseball. If the AAC were to get a sweeter TV deal come negotiation time and we happen to get $10-12M a year on TV...then maybe If we join Big 12 conference with the $40M per year deal, then definitely
-

Big12Mustang

-
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
by SMU2007 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:25 pm
Big12Mustang wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:PEOPLE LOVE WINNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if SMU took on baseball & GOT SERIOUS about it, they'd be there to support BASEBALL, too. It's not rocket science.
The fact of the matter is that SMU never was serious about baseball when they had baseball.
Let's get our football team to start winning more than 10 games per year before we even think about adding baseball. If the AAC were to get a sweeter TV deal come negotiation time and we happen to get $10-12M a year on TV...then maybe If we join Big 12 conference with the $40M per year deal, then definitely
Please. Let's compete in a low/mid tier conference or play competitively against any opponent that the casual fan has heard of before we start asking for 10+ win seasons...
-

SMU2007

-
- Posts: 5561
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am
by RebStang » Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:35 pm
Big12Mustang wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:PEOPLE LOVE WINNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if SMU took on baseball & GOT SERIOUS about it, they'd be there to support BASEBALL, too. It's not rocket science.
The fact of the matter is that SMU never was serious about baseball when they had baseball.
Let's get our football team to start winning more than 10 games per year before we even think about adding baseball. If the AAC were to get a sweeter TV deal come negotiation time and we happen to get $10-12M a year on TV...then maybe If we join Big 12 conference with the $40M per year deal, then definitely
My take on baseball at SMU is pretty simple: I think we would have a better chance of winning the CWS within 10-15 years of starting a baseball team than we would of making it to a BCS bowl game. In college baseball, the deck is stacked in favor of private universities that have money. That's why Vanderbilt just won the CWS (finally). The scholarship rules for baseball play right into our hands - the state schools can only give 11.7 but non-athletic scholarship/grant money doesn't count against it. The only thing we're missing is a facility and, the way SMU does things, any facility we build would be first class. I like lacrosse (there's something to be said for a sport where hitting other guys with a stick is ok) but the reality is that baseball fits the areas where our students come from better. SMU seems to target states like California and Florida heavily. Guess where a lot of the top baseball talent comes from... California and Florida. Start handing out full rides based on need and "unique talents" to baseball players and we'd have a top flight program in short order.
-

RebStang

-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:45 pm
- Location: Birmingham, Al
by smusic 00 » Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:27 am
That was Vanderbilt's first national championship in any male sport. Maybe not the best example. They've been playing since 1886.
-

smusic 00

-
- Posts: 6912
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: Downtown
by mrydel » Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:50 am
smusic 00 wrote:That was Vanderbilt's first national championship in any male sport. Maybe not the best example. They've been playing since 1886.
They did win one in Bowling. Do not know if it was men's or women's however.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Return to Around the Hilltop
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests
|
|