Page 1 of 2
Land Sale: Potomac Park

Posted:
Sun May 06, 2007 5:40 pm
by Water Pony

Posted:
Sun May 06, 2007 6:00 pm
by CalallenStang
Fellow resident Tom Blackwell, who also opposes the sale, said the problem with selling the land to SMU is that another piece of property will be removed from the city's tax roll, possibly causing taxes to rise. "The tax base is disappearing," he said.
Mr. Blackwell, does the city tax its own park land?


Posted:
Sun May 06, 2007 6:48 pm
by that's great raplh

Posted:
Sun May 06, 2007 10:50 pm
by PK
Obviously not the sharpest tack in the jar.

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 1:06 am
by couch 'em
I don't see how anyone can really call it a "park". It's too small to use as a park, and nobody lives around it except SMU students. It's just a waste.

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 6:50 am
by NavyCrimson
where is this park?

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 8:12 am
by Bergermeister
It's a median that runs parallel to the alley behind the SMU Bookstore. No question about the outcome of the vote, just a formality.
Don't tug on Superman's cape.

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 8:17 am
by NavyCrimson
thx - that is SMALL

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 7:59 pm
by Ponymon
CalallenStang wrote:Fellow resident Tom Blackwell, who also opposes the sale, said the problem with selling the land to SMU is that another piece of property will be removed from the city's tax roll, possibly causing taxes to rise. "The tax base is disappearing," he said.
Mr. Blackwell, does the city tax its own park land?

Actually the city will reduce its maintenance costs as well as turning a non-productive property into an asset that can generate some cash if invested properly. Of course, that is an oxymoron for any government entity to make a good investment!

Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 8:02 pm
by NavyCrimson
LOL!!!
oxymoron???
Great post ponymon


Posted:
Mon May 07, 2007 10:17 pm
by CalallenStang
Ponymon wrote:CalallenStang wrote:Fellow resident Tom Blackwell, who also opposes the sale, said the problem with selling the land to SMU is that another piece of property will be removed from the city's tax roll, possibly causing taxes to rise. "The tax base is disappearing," he said.
Mr. Blackwell, does the city tax its own park land?

Actually the city will reduce its maintenance costs as well as turning a non-productive property into an asset that can generate some cash if invested properly. Of course, that is an oxymoron for any government entity to make a good investment!
Exactly. Mr. Blackwell is probably fighting this for the same reason Gary Vodicka filed suit in the University Gardens case. Someone check his campaign contribution record...

Posted:
Tue May 08, 2007 7:49 am
by Nacho
I go there with my dog Spot every Sunday. We have the best time. What a wonderful park. Spectacular views. Great place to play frisbee with Spot. Good times.

Posted:
Tue May 08, 2007 8:30 am
by Water Pony
It will be missed. A wonderful Polo Field


Posted:
Tue May 08, 2007 1:48 pm
by Nacho
My story has a sad ending. One fine Sunday Spot and I were out there as usual. Me throwing and Spot catching when a group of students--I mean a big group came to our liitle park with about 10 kegs. Well all was going fine. Spot and I continued to play frisbee but then someone from the SMU group started throwing trash can lids like frisbees. Spot being the afable dog he was joined in with the SMU crowd. He was having a great time and then suddenly out of nowhere--tragedy. A can hit him right between the eyes. Spot was dazed. He stumbled and fell. His body quivering. I tried mouth to mouth but Spot was gone. Thanks SMU students. Thanks a lot. You can have your stupid park. I hope HP sells it to you so can keep having your keggers.

Posted:
Tue May 08, 2007 2:47 pm
by EastStang
Did Spot look kind of like Revellie? Was it a trash can lid or a tin can lid? I could think of a few jokes, but I'll just let these inquiring questions linger.