PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Money Games

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Money Games

Postby Nacho » Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:03 pm

Can we please stop overscheduling until we can compete. Money games are fine and dandy but I would sure feel a lot better being 2-1 after beating Temple or Buffalo than 1-2 like we are now. If we have to play these money games can we somehow not be on tv or on CSTV (which is exactly like not being on tv). My 2 cents. I propose that we not play any more money games until 2021.

Money games would include any and all teams from the BCS (except Duke and usually Vandy). If we have to play a BCS school from the Big 12 Baylor is ok and Oklahoma is ok. Some of those spare teams for the Big East are ok. Washington form the Pac -10 is ok. Don't schedule Boise from the WAC. No MWC teams because they all make me nauseous (TCU is ok since we just beat the tar out of them). Yours in peace and love. Nacho.
Nacho
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6043
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am

Postby abezontar » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:07 pm

ok.....what was wrong with out non-conference schedule this year, we played two very winnable games, and one that wasn't. Yeah, I would have liked to have beaten or competed with tamu, but we didn't. Instead we had two decent (for us) crowds at two games that we shouldn't have one, and one game that we got spanked. We very easily could be 2-1 right now and feeling a lot better about ourselves for those two wins than if we had played Texas State or Ark. State. Screw the D-IAA teams, bring on the Baylors, TCUs and yes at least one tamu a year.
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Postby Charleston Pony » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:30 pm

nothing wrong with playing TCU and Baylor every year but I'd like to see UNT rather than A$M. I would expect SMU to be very competitive with Baylor, TCU and UNT and the rest of CUSA. Those games against A$M or any other upper echelon BCS school should be reserved for 12 game years or for bowl games. I'd add Army/Navy to the mix of regular non-conference scheduling. Teams we can compete with and might STILL appeal to fans
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28934
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby that's great raplh » Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:51 pm

i can't get revved up about AA schools

i'd rather play some 1a doormats and sun belt schools
User avatar
that's great raplh
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
Location: bottom of a sewer

Postby Butts in the Stands » Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:26 pm

There's no upside to playing the Sam Houston States and Texas States of college football. A win is expected and when it actually occurs means little. A loss is unexpected and very damaging. I would rather get beat by atm or other BCS schools than beat (or even worse lose to) these spares. What recruit looks at a schedule that includes these guys and gets fired up? I would rather be the underdog who gets the chance to upset a major program than a sad program that gets upsets by Texas State. Don't get me wrong though - I would prefer to beat the top tier programs! While we are in the process of getting to that point, I don't want to drift further into oblivion by scheduling games that have no upside for our program.
Butts in the Stands
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:43 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests