Clark Harrell picks Tulsa

by **ponyboy** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:12 pm

jtstang wrote:we have to take this accomplishment with a grain of salt, follwed by a shot of tequila.....

Finally, we agree on something, jt. Make mine Herreradura.

by **jtstang** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:23 pm

I'll have the same--silver, 100% agave, please.

by **mustangbill67** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:10 pm

Herradura Reposado por favor, con limon!

by **Casey** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:46 pm

McClown27 wrote:
Casey wrote:Gee, ya' think? Coaches recruit "against" each other all the time -- that's as old as the game itself.

Casey,

Why do you think we are being beat for Texas prospects by Tulsa (not Big 12 schools)? I look forward to hearing your keen insight. Sorry for attempting some analysis.

McClown

McC -- sorry, I was a little lit when I wrote that. Didn't mean to be quite that obnoxious (it's just a gift, I guess. :wink:

) I just meant that the idea of the coaches at one school bad-mouthing another isn't unique to SMU, or to this season -- happens everywhere, every year. As for why we've lost kids to Tulsa, I have no idea. I would expect the old Allen HS coach has a lot of connections, so he's gotten some of them. Beyond that, the C-USA tutle didn't hurt, that's for sure. Even with all that, though, I still can't figure out why anyone would choose Tulsa over SMU....

by **McClown27** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:09 pm

Casey wrote:I would expect the old Allen HS coach has a lot of connections, so he's gotten some of them. Beyond that, the C-USA tutle didn't hurt, that's for sure. Even with all that, though, I still can't figure out why anyone would choose Tulsa over SMU....

I am with you. I wouldn't care as much if we were being beat by UT in recruiting, but Tulsa.

Clark Harrell picks Tulsa

Who is online