This big old beast - Charles Brallier

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:14 pm

travelinman67 wrote:I've been reading the debate over whether strength and weight are THAT important at the HS level, here's what a 6-3 320lb 16 year old DT/NT, who benches 365, squats 620, and runs a 4.84 shuttle can do to a "Nike Camp" level:
1) 268lb OL
2) 280lb OL
3) 258lb OL
...the shortest is 6-2 and all three bench 23+ reps.

http://www.spaceeater.com/Charles_Brall ... Drills.wmv

God Bless SMU and God Bless America.

Thanks for letting me speak my piece.

I typically reserve comment on a recruit until I see him play in person; however, after watching that, I will go ahead and comment: Wow!

by **ponydawg** » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:13 pm

Nice Job! Hope he has a great year!

by **smu diamond m** » Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:37 pm

My God. This kid is a monster.

by **mavsrage311** » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:33 pm

I'm not usually one to poop on the party as my ponyfans name is not Stallion, but look at the size of the linemen he moved around, those guys are pretty tiny. It really doesn't mean much

by PK » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:57 pm

mavsrage311 wrote:I'm not usually one to poop on the party as my ponyfans name is not Stallion, but look at the size of the linemen he moved around, those guys are pretty tiny. It really doesn't mean much

Oh poop...at 320, everyone else looks tiny...and I think that is the point. At least one of those guys weighed in at 280...for whatever that is worth.

by **tmustangp** » Sat Jun 17, 2006 4:27 am

once again.. if the guy plays defensive or offensive line.. HIS SPEED DOES NOT MATTER, unless he plays DE of course.. but a DT does not need to be even running a 40... the shuttle is what matter and his vertical tells us what kind of explosion he has along w/ squatting over 600 lbs..

stop fretting about a DT or OG speed..

by **me@smu** » Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:16 am

Kid squats 620lbs as a Junior...I don't care if the lineman are 250 or 300. With that much strength in his legs, Charles will move a pile.

by **Stallion** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:55 am

In an article on Rivals today, Brailler is quoted as listing his top 4-and SMU was not among them. Instead, he lists Washington, Oklahoma St., Idaho and Utah-still no offers.

by **me@smu** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:15 pm

Charles's father has been in contact with a few of us talking about how interested Charles is in SMU.

In any case with no offers anywhere, Charles future is still very much open

by **Mustang07** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:27 pm

If we could get these guys to come out on a sunny day on the boulevard and see all those sorority girls no way they would choose Utah or Idaho... that is one advantage we have on just about any school...

by **BUS** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:29 am

Are we in a dead period for recruiting? Or am I spoiled because we have received other commitments??

Thanks.

by **Pony Fan** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:22 pm

me@smu wrote:Charles's father has been in contact with a few of us talking about how interested Charles is in SMU.

In any case with no offers anywhere, Charles future is still very much open

How dare you question Stallion and what he reads on Rivals!

by **Stallion** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:00 pm

maybe father doesn't speak for Son because those were exact quotes.That's why I specifically used the word "quoted". Maybe father wants his Son to get his first scholarship offer. But always remember do not be frightened by additional information.

by **me@smu** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:25 pm

Or perhaps father does know his son's interest and though we aren't in his top four, we could still be in the mix. Haven't seen anything that says he has made any cuts to his overall list.

But most important...don't be afraid to look beyond the quotes.

by **Ponymon** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:10 pm

Could our extensive qualifying process be the reason that we, reportedly, have not offered yet?????????????????

This big old beast - Charles Brallier

...

Re: ...

Who is online