|
Review of Michigan-Notre Dame outcomeModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
31 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Review of Michigan-Notre Dame outcomeI think there needs to be a review of the outcome of the Michigan - Notre Dame last Saturday. Notre Dame lost, and since it had a much better team than Michigan there must have been an external force affecting the game, such as officiating a la Oregon - Oklahoma.
We all know that even on its best day there is no way a Big-10 team can beat Notre Dame. I HATE the University of Texas!
hope you enjoyed it
![]() muffie benson perella 169 black horseshoes - Green Party Activist - I am the Greetest! Now selling Hope at a price slightly higher than free...
Last year, they had a great record. Let's see how great...
Record = 9-3 (9-2 in regular season) at Pittsburgh W 42-21 at Michigan W 17-10 Michigan St L 44-41 OT at Washington W 36-17 at Purdue W 49-28 USC L 34-31 BYU W 49-23 Tennessee W 41-21 Navy W 42-21 Syracuse W 34-10 at Stanford W 38-31 ----------------------- Ohio State L 34-20 How is ND overranked? Simple: when they beat several of the above teams, when they beat them (above), several of their opponents were highly overranked, probably due to traditional expectations (including once ranked Tennessee). Examples: When ND played... ...Michigan was #3, but finished unranked with 5 losses. ...Pittsburg was #23, but finished 5-6 and unranked. ...Purdue was #22, but finished 5-6 and unranked. Now, let’s break that down. - In regular season, they went 9-2. - The two LOSSES were to USC and Mich State (a 5-6 team) - The 9 WINS were against TWO teams with winning record (Michigan that lost 5 games that year, and Navy). - The combined record of teams of the 9 victories was: 44 wins and 58 losses. - The overall combined opponents’ record is 59-65. Now, let's look at that LIST again... ...Look at the opponents' records. * = loss Pitt (5-6) Mich (7-5) <--won by 7 against a team that would have 5 losses * Mich State (5-6) <--Lost in OT, but ND got credit for the close loss because MSU was 3-0 at the time Wash (2-9) <--impressive win? Purdue (5-6) <--another 6 loss team * USC (11-1) <--this was an impressive loss, no doubt. But this wasn’t the same Nat’l Champ team of the year before BYU (6-6) <--MWC, 6 losses again Tenn (5-6) <--bad 6 loss Tenn team that everyone thought would dominate after devastating win in the Cotton bowl against Aggies Navy (8-4) <-- win over Navy, but Navy had about the weakest schedule in football last year (see below) Syracuse (1-10) <-- another impressive win Stanford (5-6) <-- Stanford lost to a 1-AA team this year, one of their wins was NAVY BOWL GAME * Ohio State (11-1) NAVY SCHEDULE Maryland L 23-20 Stanford L 41-38 <--bottom dweller at Rice Postponed <--bottom dweller at Duke W 28-21 <--bottom dweller Air Force W 27-24 Kent State W 34-31 at Rice W 41-9 <--bottom dweller at Rutgers L 31-21 <--bottom dweller Tulane W 49-21 <--bottom dweller at No. 7 Notre Dame L 42-21 Temple W 38-17 <--bottom dweller at Army W 42-23 <--bottom dweller vs Colorado State W 51-30 Record 8-4
What 35 said.... I HATE the University of Texas!
Mustang1991
Drop the sour grapes act. Do you go to the Bob Stoops school of kicking and screaming? When Notre Dame has a secondary that can catch up to the deep ball, then you can talk national title. Until then....NOTRE DAME SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKS and just got its [deleted] whipped by the POWER OF THE BIG 10!!!! Good luck this weekend in Lansing against Michigan St., which has won the last 7 meetings.
And this is different from Big 12 Schools playing C-USA or Sunbelt schools, or SEC teams playing schools from conferences one has never heard of?
I also might add that the Big Ten has a healthy 58% win percentage in the BCS bowls, when the supposed "big boys" are out to play.
of course...no championship game.
There have been at least 2 years where the Big12 had 2 teams that would have been in the BCS games, but the Champ game f'ed them, and only one went (the lesser team won the Champ game). I am not arguing for the Big12, they suck this year, clearly. But, ever since Big/Pac10 joined the BCS, there has been a bias to give the 'extra' game to a Pac10 team or a Big10 team...until Mack Brown cried his way in over CAL that one year (then CAL got their [deleted] handed to them by TxTECH). That was the same year Mich lost to Texas. Save Ohio state, they haven't had a good team in a while. Penn State had a nice run last year, and hit all their teams on down years (including the Big10 schedule). That was a 7-5 Michigan team last year, mind you. Purdue was ranked and finished 5-6. MichState was 3-0 and beat ND, then finished 5-6... I mean, your 4th place team had 5 losses last year. Penn State 7-1 11-1 Ohio State 7-1 10-2 Wisconsin 5-3 10-3 Northwestern 5-3 7-5 Michigan 5-3 7-5 Iowa 5-3 7-5 Minnesota 4-4 7-5 Purdue 3-5 5-6 Michigan State 2-6 5-6 Indiana 1-7 4-7 Illinois 0-8 2-9
Last year was a down year for the Big Ten, no doubt. Though to be fair, the winning team in the SEC had 2 losses, and the next three teams 3.
I disagree (obviously) with you that, generally speaking, the Big Ten 'sucks.' It's that kind of arguement I think would be more fun with a 1a playoff. To be perfectly honest though, I'm not really a "Big Ten" fan like the poster of the same name. By dint of growing up in Michigan I am a UM fan (and by proxy somewhat interested in OSU because I feel the season is more interesting when they are both good). I can count on one hand the number of Iowa, Penn State, etc. games I watched last year eithier UM or OSU were not in. Also...I would sign a Faustian pack relegating UM to 10 straight years of losing to OSU to see SMU in (and win) a BCS bowl (but I dream).
And our top 3 teams won their bowl games.
Wisconsin over Auburn -- Capital One Ohio State over Notre Dame -- Fiesta Bowl Penn State over Florida State -- Orange Bowl By the way, rip the second division of the Big 10 all you want, let's remind the SEC, ACC and Big 12 kool-aid drinkiers about their slop. Notice how those folks did against the MAC, which is a BETTER CONFERENCE than people give it credit for. SEC Ole Miss -- They lost to Kentucky Kentucky -- They beat Ole Miss Miss. State -- didn't score in the first two games Vandy -- same ol same ol Arkansas -- 20 points against sorry Utah State? Big 12 Colorado -- great effort losing to Division I-AA Montana State -- AT HOME Baylor -- Nothing exciting here Kansas State -- Had to survive 1-AA team in the opener 24-23? Kansas -- great effort against the MAC -- losing to Toledo Oklahoma State -- Play absolutely no one in their non-conference ACC NC State -- great effort AGAINST THE MAC - losing to Akron at HOME Virginia -- great effort AGAINST THE MAC -- losing to W. Michigan at HOME Duke -- Horrible, Horrible Horrible North Carolina -- Had to survive I-AA Furman The Big 10 plays the MAC. At lease we beat them.
31 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 23 guests |
|