PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

SMU handled it all wrong-again

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

SMU handled it all wrong-again

Postby LakeHighlandsPony » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:26 am

I still have a big problem punishing a kid who fought back after being stalked for a year and being given no help after complaining to SMU.

This bonehead decision cost us a win at UTEP and will probably cost us the Marshall game.

Attention cheerleaders-if you are being stalked do not use mace or other items or SMU will suspend you.
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Postby Hoofbeat83 » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:30 am

why would you start a whole new thread on this subject again?

have you written to the administration to let them know how you feel? if so, good for you. you're entitled to your opinion and expressing it to the folks that are in control is the way to go.

if you haven't, then shame on you for just stirring the pot. that would fall under the 'part of the problem' category.
User avatar
Hoofbeat83
All-American
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Postby jtstang » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:34 am

How do you know the other kid was not sanctioned as well?
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby BUS » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:39 am

That's what I want to know.

BOth young guys were in the wrong from what I know. I want the full picture.
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
User avatar
BUS
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7283
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Richardson, Tx usa

Postby mrydel » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:40 am

Actually there were 3 involved and I am still curious as to how the other was overlooked. (although pleased)
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby Bergermeister » Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:07 am

We need a blue ribbon committee headed by Ross Perot and a congressional inquiry. Simple outcomes involving common sense are just not acceptable.
User avatar
Bergermeister
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
Location: University Park

Postby ponyte » Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:11 am

Having had some personal experiences with that idiot Caswell, it doesn't surprise me that this situation was a complete and total Charlie Foxtrot. If our expectations of SMU athletics has been underwhelming, rest assured the SMU judicial process deserves much lower expectations. Due process and facts take a decided back seat to theory and dysfunctional preconceived opinions.
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11211
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region

Postby mr. pony » Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:43 am

At least the DMN's Kevin Blackistone has moved on. Can you imagine what a field day he would have had with a "hate crime" allegation?
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Postby KnuckleStang » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:04 am

"Stalking" and "harrassment," though annoying, are not grounds for assault. The school was right to suspend him, although they should have wrapped the investigation up sooner to give him more practice time for the Blundering Turds.
User avatar
KnuckleStang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Lynchburg, VA, USA

Postby jtstang » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:22 am

KnuckleStang wrote:"Stalking" and "harrassment," though annoying, are not grounds for assault. The school was right to suspend him, although they should have wrapped the investigation up sooner to give him more practice time for the Blundering Turds.

See everybody says that, but this accusation of a hate crime was investigated by the athletic department and the student judicial group and completed and mediated and punishments handed out all inside of a week. I think you guys are over-blowing this noise about how it took to long.
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby mrydel » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:25 am

jtstang wrote:
KnuckleStang wrote:"Stalking" and "harrassment," though annoying, are not grounds for assault. The school was right to suspend him, although they should have wrapped the investigation up sooner to give him more practice time for the Blundering Turds.

See everybody says that, but this accusation of a hate crime was investigated by the athletic department and the student judicial group and completed and mediated and punishments handed out all inside of a week. I think you guys are over-blowing this noise about how it took to long.


With the normal pace of today's legal process, this was extremely fast. Just not as fast as some other schools have handled their problems.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby jtstang » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:27 am

mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:
KnuckleStang wrote:"Stalking" and "harrassment," though annoying, are not grounds for assault. The school was right to suspend him, although they should have wrapped the investigation up sooner to give him more practice time for the Blundering Turds.

See everybody says that, but this accusation of a hate crime was investigated by the athletic department and the student judicial group and completed and mediated and punishments handed out all inside of a week. I think you guys are over-blowing this noise about how it took to long.


With the normal pace of today's legal process, this was extremely fast. Just not as fast as some other schools have handled their problems.

SMU's rug is not as big as some other schools.
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby SApony » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:35 am

Let's move on, the Herd is in town!
User avatar
SApony
Varsity
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:51 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Postby PonyPride » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:37 am

mrydel wrote:With the normal pace of today's legal process, this was extremely fast....
While we all wanted an immediate resolution, mrydel is right -- this DID move very quickly.

There are two families that are trying to move on and get their lives back to some level of normalcy. They want to move on, and so should we .... please.
User avatar
PonyPride
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 22389
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: SMU handled it all wrong-again

Postby PhirePhilBennett » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:54 am

LakeHighlandsPony wrote:I still have a big problem punishing a kid who fought back after being stalked for a year and being given no help after complaining to SMU.

This bonehead decision cost us a win at UTEP and will probably cost us the Marshall game.

Attention cheerleaders-if you are being stalked do not use mace or other items or SMU will suspend you.


LKP, you don't live in reality. Regardless of being stalked, his life wasn't threatened...

The law is the law, if they hadn't suspended him, he might be facing charges of aggrevated assault and battery with only a defense to the hate crime nomenclature.

By suspending him, he was punished, and there is less likelihood that charges will be brought.

Think before you type.
PhirePhilBennett
 

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests