|
7-5 vs 6-6 teams in bowlsModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
7-5 vs 6-6 teams in bowlsI have read all about this deal in various thread on this board and others. Regarding SMU going to NOLA at 6-6, is it possible for a bowl to pick a 6-6 team over a 7-5 team as long as the conference is contractually tied to the bowl? I thought the 7-5 rule only applied for bowls with at-large spots (i.e. the Poinsettia Bowl would have to take an at-large 7-5 MAC team before it could take an at-large 6-6 Big12 team). My guess is that a bowl can choose any bowl eligible team from a conference that is contractually tied to the bowl...but that is only a guess. Can anyone confirm?
Someone posted the language. As I recall it was definite that 7-5 goes before 6-6 but if contracted a 6-6 would be picked from the contracting conference before a noncontracted team with a better record.
![]() Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
From http://www.ncaa.org/library/handbooks/f ... ndbook.pdf
Deserving Winning Team A deserving winning team is defined as one that wins a minimum of six games against Division I-A competition and has a record that includes more wins than losses. [Exception: Each year, a Division I-A institution may count a victory against a Division I-AA opponent that has averaged 90 percent of the permissible maximum number of grants-in-aid per year in Division I-AA football over a rolling two-year period.] Per Bylaw exception 30.9.2.1 an institution with a record of six wins and six losses may be selected for participation in a bowl game if 1) the institution or its conference has a primary contractual affiliation, which existed prior to the first contest of the applicable season, with the sponsoring bowl organization. In the case of a conference contractual affiliation, all conference teams with winning records must be placed in one of the contracted bowl games before any institution with a record of six wins and six losses may be placed in a contracted bowl game; and 2) all contratual affiliations have been fulfilled and all institutions with winning records have received bowl invitations (either through a contractual affiliation or as an at-large selection). Division I-A contests played in Hawaii are exempt from NCAA legislation limiting a season to 11 games, but this competition does count in the six-win requirement. An institution that participates in an exempt contest, however, must have more wins than losses against Division I-A opponents to be eligible to participate in a bowl game, even if it meets the six-win requirement.
Per Bylaw exception 30.9.2.1 an institution with a record of six wins and six losses may be selected for participation in a bowl game if 1) the institution or its conference has a primary contractual affiliation, which existed prior to the first contest of the applicable season, with the sponsoring bowl organization. In the case of a conference contractual affiliation, all conference teams with winning records must be placed in one of the contracted bowl games before any institution with a record of six wins and six losses may be placed in a contracted bowl game.
Thanks...that answers my question. Beat Rice.
No problem. Maybe someone will make this a sticky, so I don't have to keep correcting people. ![]()
Why are games played in Hawaii exempt? Travel-related expenses? Sir, shooting-star, sir.
Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
Yes. Making that game exempt allows you to schedule one more home game in order to sell tickets and offset travel costs. It also makes non-conference scheduling possible for Hawaii.
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests |
|