|
Amusing Ourselves to DeathModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
42 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Amusing Ourselves to DeathQuestion: With about 300 gun injuries per day in the U.S., and about 80 deaths per day resulting from those injuries, why do we dwell on incidents such as the terrible tragedy in Virginia?
Answer: Because we find entertainment in it. Read Neal Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death, a book which was required reading a few years back for incoming SMU freshmen.
Not having read the book, I suspect there is some merit to the notion. But the other 80 deaths are all in isolation an likely involve many shooters and many unintentional acts, while the sheer magnitude of the Columbine-like bloodbaths make them stand out.
You could probably write a chapter to that book for every type of bad news that makes headlines in society today.
Thanks jt. Yes, no one but really sick people are even slightly amused by this. The point is that modern media has created a voyeuristic culture in which we get deeply involved in the intricate details of tragedy for no reason other than its entertainment value.
Let me ask you this. What action -- other than paranoia next time you step on a college campus -- do you plan to take now that this tragedy occurred? How many victims' families will you personally aid? Will you sweep broken glass, mop up blood, stitch survivors' wounds? Not likely. What Postman calls the "information/action ratio" is nearly zero. So it becomes macabre entertainment. You either turn it off, cry a lot, become very hardened (and therefore more likely to do such an act yourself -- see the sick people comment above), or you act. But the opportunity for true action in such times is very rare -- there's only so much a person can do when the tragedy occurs in Virginia and you're in, say, Texas. Heck, there's only so much a person can do who lives in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Thank goodness you can manage to keep the politics out.
And who will be the great arbitrator who decides who is nuts enough and who is not nuts enough to snap...prior to the actual snaping? Were only life and it's dilemmas so simple and easy to deal with. ![]()
Going back to a point I made in the above post... This person was taking medication for depression. I can not spell it but... Psychotrophic drugs have been a common ,11 out of 12, thread in the shootings for the past 10 years.
Druging kids to show signs of controlled behavior is not the way to go. Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
Yes and no. If the person administering the drugs has properly diagnosed the condition and is using appropriate medication then anti-depressants should not be a problem. Problem is, it costs money to see a psychiatrist enough to make sure that the proper medication has been prescribed and that it is having the intended effect. It also takes a patient who is honest with the psychiatrist, otherwise it can do more harm than good. The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney? Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
you might also find among those 11 cases that in fact many of those kids actually refused to take their prescribed drugs which in fact triggered the violence. That is the concern of many in the psychiatric field as many patients on these drugs refuse or decide that they don't want to take them any more. That is often the danger point.
42 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|