Who Am I?

[Stallion]

You mean the guy that the Dallas Cowboys interviewed for their head coach position last year? No not him. Gary Gibbs is a better hire than Pudge Johnson.

[Dwan]

Gary Gibbs name has not been mentioned for ONE college head coaching opening in at least 5 years. Not one interview, ZERO interest in him as a head coach. Paul Johnson's name has been mentioned for almost every head coach job the past 2 years. So, either you know more than the ADs and search firms, or you are wrong.

And give me a break with that reach around interview with the Cowboys last year. Homeboys was never a serious candidate.

[PonyDoh]

You mean the guy that the Dallas Cowboys interviewed for their head coach position last year? No not him. Gary Gibbs is a better hire than Pudge Johnson.

The fact that you are so off base about Johnson, make this hire delicious, if it happens.

[bigdaddy08091]

Gary Gibbs name has not been mentioned for ONE college head coaching opening in at least 5 years. Not one interview, ZERO interest in him as a head coach. Paul Johnson's name has been mentioned for almost every head coach job the past 2 years. So, either you know more than the ADs and search firms, or you are wrong.

And give me a break with that reach around interview with the Cowboys last year. Homeboys was never a serious candidate.

He should be a serious candidate for this post. He is doing just fine in New Orleans under Payton.

[PhirePhilBennett]

1) Won National Coach of the Year Award at an Academy
2) Multiple bowl games during tenure at Academy
3) Won multiple bowl games against Teams that are now BCS at Academy
4) Beat Notre Dame while Coaching at an Academy
5) Ran Triple Option Offense which routinely lead the nation in Rushing Offense
6) Had a lifetime record of 113-62 prior to taking final job at a small Division 1A private school;
7) At that small private school had a record of only 55-78
No bowls
9) No championships

Fisher DeBerry?

[PhirePhilBennett]

Stallion, this is the kind of disingenuous [deleted] that p!$$es me off.


Year Team Win Loss Tie
1979 Air Force (CO) 2 9 0
1980 Air Force (CO) 2 9 1
1981 Air Force (CO) 4 7 0
1982 Air Force (CO) 8 5 0
1983 Air Force (CO) 10 2 0
1984 Arkansas 7 4 1
1985 Arkansas 10 2 0
1986 Arkansas 9 3 0
1987 Arkansas 9 4 0
1988 Arkansas 10 2 0
1989 Arkansas 10 2 0
1990 Clemson (SC) 10 2 0
1991 Clemson (SC) 9 2 1
1992 Clemson (SC) 5 6 0
1993 Clemson (SC) 8 3 0
1994 Rice (TX) 5 6 0
1995 Rice (TX) 2 8 1
1996 Rice (TX) 7 4 0
1997 Rice (TX) 7 4 0
1998 Rice (TX) 5 6 0
1999 Rice (TX) 5 6 0
2000 Rice (TX) 3 8 0
2001 Rice (TX) 8 4 0
2002 Rice (TX) 4 7 0
2003 Rice (TX) 5 7 0
2004 Rice (TX) 3 8 0
2005 Rice (TX) 1 10 0

Hey, so Rice went 7-4 two years in a row in 96 and 97 and then 8-4 in 2001 and still didn't go to a bowl game?

I know there are a lot more bowls now than 10 years ago, but I didn't realize it was that tough back then.

That's when the evil Boal Coalition / BCS had locks on so many bowls...like when Northern Illinois was 10-1 and missed a bowl.

[StallionsModelT]

Stallion is the reason I hope we never eradicate cancer.

[George S. Patton]

Just as long as you remember you have been wrong about just about everything you have ever predicted.

Oh, but trust fund baby, when I have been wrong, I've at least had the grace to admit it. You, not so much!

And if that's the best you have in this, then you're not doing very well.

BTW, when you look at Hatfield's record at Rice -- he pulled off three winning seasons there -- how many have we had since 1989? But don't worry about that.

All you do is just further your disconnect with the university because whoever you crossed swords with made sure you were termed a pariah. But keep on preaching the gospel.

And I'm still waiting for that list on the predictions thing. I asked you for that two weeks ago. Since you have time on your hands, go through all the threads, document it and make sure you post. Call it a project.

[StallionsModelT]

Patton,

He will not respond whenever he's called out b/c he is, in essence, a cyber [deleted]. It empowers some people to act the way they do on the net because they would never have the balls to do so in the real world. Its not all that uncommon among those who have much larger inadequacies in their lives they'd rather not acknowledge.

[George S. Patton]

Patton,

He will not respond whenever he's called out b/c he is, in essence, a cyber [deleted]. It empowers some people to act the way they do on the net because they would never have the balls to do so in the real world. Its not all that uncommon among those who have much larger inadequacies in their lives they'd rather not acknowledge.

He's just a gloomy gus!