|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by ponyfan84 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:49 am
i love those claw marks on the side of their pants. let's just hope adidas doesn't put horseshoes on the side of ours. hideous, hideous uniforms.
-
ponyfan84

-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:03 pm
- Location: New York
by DickerJames » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:49 am
I don't care for the cat stripes on the pants, but if you compare them to what Nike does then they look old school.
-

DickerJames

-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Bergermeister » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:31 am
adida$
-

Bergermeister

-
- Posts: 7132
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: University Park
by Pony Up » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:11 am
As goofy as those claw marks are on the sides, they're still a billion times better than the mess Nike rolls out in Oregon ...
... or the one-arm crap in Florida ...
... or whatever this fashion trainwreck is supposed to be in Syracuse.

Proud to be a PonyFan
-

Pony Up

-
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Waco, Texas
by NavyCrimson » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:15 am
What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their souls for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms.
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!
For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
-

NavyCrimson

-
- Posts: 3163
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)
by abezontar » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:38 pm
NavyCrimson wrote:What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their soles for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms, also.
How can they play football when they don't have bottoms to their feet?
The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?
Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
-

abezontar

-
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Mustang, TX
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:47 pm
abezontar wrote:NavyCrimson wrote:What's really bizarre is that the college's have sold their soles for this crap - but then again - that's college football in the 21st century. LOL
As for Syracuse, I believe those are retro in style but they also decided to use them for their regular uniforms, also.
How can they play football when they don't have bottoms to their feet?
maybe because they sold fish instead?
-

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex

-
- Posts: 2914
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by Paladin » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:27 pm
DickerJames wrote:I don't care for the cat stripes on the pants, but if you compare them to what Nike does then they look old school.
Those aren't football uniforms; they were just auditioning for Cats off-broadway
-

Paladin

-
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:57 pm
- Location: Grapevine, TX
by jimmieho » Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:56 pm
I don't think Aididas will go too overboard with our uni. You don't see the SMU stuff marketed out beyond the university. It appears SMU maintains a little control with what adn how the market their apparel/uniforms.
-

jimmieho

-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:27 pm
by J.T.supporta » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:47 pm
i say expect a somewhat basic but sleak jersey design like the Nebraska jerseys
-

J.T.supporta

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: SMU
by that's great raplh » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:51 pm
that orangeman uni was cool
muffie benson perella
169 black horseshoes - Green Party Activist - I am the Greetest!
Now selling Hope at a price slightly higher than free...
-

that's great raplh

-
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: bottom of a sewer
by mustang1108 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:21 am
I don't think adidas does a bad job with jerseys they usually tend to have some of the more classic looks. Just look at the teams they have that have some of the most classic looks in college football like tennessee, wisconsin, notre dame, and ucla. also did anyone notice that on the ugliest uniform thread with the exception of notre dame green and rhode island all the rest were made by nike. and honestly i don't know how rhode island made it. their uniforms really aren't very good but who cares about that school and i have seen a lot worse in d 1-a
-
mustang1108

-
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:33 pm
- Location: Plano
by smu diamond m » Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:35 am
Cin's unis weren't too ugly, but the claw rips in the side look ghetto
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
-

smu diamond m

-
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: High on the Hilltop
-
by J.T.supporta » Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:03 am
smu diamond m wrote:Cin's unis weren't too ugly, but the claw rips in the side look ghetto
dont know how those nice new unis look ghetto
-

J.T.supporta

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: SMU
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], well travelled pony and 4 guests
|
|