|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by me@smu » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:19 pm
<http://ll-100.ea.com/cem/u/f/GPO/easports.com/ncaa09/playbooks/SMU/SMU.
pdf>
-

me@smu

-
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
- Location: Dallas
by NickSMU17 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:30 pm
Is it Hawaii's playbook from last year???
-
NickSMU17

-
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
- Location: Hinsdale, IL
by The PonyGrad » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:33 pm
NickSMU17 wrote:Is it Hawaii's playbook from last year???
That would be the best choice I would think, under the circumstances. 
Go Ponies!! Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
-

The PonyGrad

-
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Colony, TX
by ThadFilms » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:49 pm
SMU Football Blog wrote:linky linky no worky
Remove the "<>"s ...
http://ll-100.ea.com/cem/u/f/GPO/easpor ... MU/SMU.pdf
 Eric Dickerson in Pony Excess"I've love winning man, it's like better than losing." - Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh
-

ThadFilms

-
- Posts: 6607
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Austin TX / Dallas TX / Hollywoodland CA
-
by ponydawg » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:56 pm
do we know or has it been reported here yet if JW is the QB on the game?
-

ponydawg

-
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:01 am
by SMU Football Blog » Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:32 pm
I have been playing SMU with Hawaii's offense on dynasty mode for a couple of weeks after putting it down for 3-4 months. THe playbook is somewhat different.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by me@smu » Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:32 pm
Thought I saw that JW would infact be in the game.
Regarding rosters...EA is giving away the full named rosters this year...so don't bother paying for it. You can get them from the EA locker online
-

me@smu

-
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
- Location: Dallas
by SmooPower » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:03 pm
Willis is not the first or second string QB according to the strategy guide.
-

SmooPower

-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Frisco, TX, USA
-
by RGV Pony » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:16 pm
SmooPower wrote:Willis is not the first or second string QB according to the strategy guide.
So they must've used the roster from the spring? Turner then a couple of walkons?
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by SmooPower » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:24 pm
QB1
#12 ThP 79 THA 88 Overall 82
QB2
#14 THP 70 ThA 86 Overall 80
-

SmooPower

-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Frisco, TX, USA
-
by RGV Pony » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:12 pm
Turner & Rhodes?
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by SmooPower » Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:24 pm
http://www.sportsgamer.com/content/1655 ... r-ratings/
Actually the QBs are rated 79 and 70. And Willis is not in the game. Player followed by overall rating -
C #51 :: 75
C #59 :: 72
C #65 :: 67
CB #10 :: 77
CB #7 :: 77
CB #21 :: 74
CB #25 :: 71
CB #12 :: 70
DT #46 :: 76
DT #93 :: 74
DT #99 :: 73
DT #95 :: 68
FB #45 :: 73
FS #6 :: 84
FS #35 :: 72
FS #31 :: 68
FS #14 :: 52
HB #8 :: 85
HB #20 :: 80
HB #1 :: 73
HB #25 :: 68
HB #30 :: 65
HB #22 :: 63
K #15 :: 85
K #4 :: 54
LE #40 :: 91
LE #94 :: 80
LE #98 :: 66
LG #74 :: 73
LG #67 :: 72
LG #64 :: 71
LOLB #52 :: 80
LOLB #54 :: 73
LOLB #38 :: 70
LT #72 :: 69
LT #71 :: 68
MLB #27 :: 81
MLB #39 :: 69
MLB #29 :: 66
MLB #59 :: 59
P #11 :: 71
QB #12 :: 79
QB #14 :: 70
QB #13 :: 58
RE #70 :: 79
RE #97 :: 61
RE #91 :: 60
RG #68 :: 71
RG #77 :: 62
ROLB #34 :: 72
ROLB #36 :: 68
RT #82 :: 73
RT #79 :: 72
SS #41 :: 74
SS #32 :: 66
TE #86 :: 86
TE #89 :: 74
TE #87 :: 70
WR #17 :: 80
WR #5 :: 77
WR #9 :: 74
WR #26 :: 72
WR #24 :: 72
WR #2 :: 70
WR #88 :: 66
WR #80 :: 66
WR #83 :: 62
-

SmooPower

-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Frisco, TX, USA
-
by J.T.supporta » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:24 pm
SmooPower wrote:And Willis is not in the game.
he can just create himself and put all of his stats at 99. thats what I do
-

J.T.supporta

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: SMU
by couch 'em » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:55 pm
SmooPower wrote:http://www.sportsgamer.com/content/1655/sportsgamer-exclusive-full-ncaa-football-09-player-ratings/
Actually the QBs are rated 79 and 70. And Willis is not in the game. Player followed by overall rating -
C #51 :: 75 C #59 :: 72 C #65 :: 67 CB #10 :: 77 CB #7 :: 77 CB #21 :: 74 CB #25 :: 71 CB #12 :: 70 DT #46 :: 76 DT #93 :: 74 DT #99 :: 73 DT #95 :: 68 FB #45 :: 73 FS #6 :: 84 FS #35 :: 72 FS #31 :: 68 FS #14 :: 52 HB #8 :: 85 HB #20 :: 80 HB #1 :: 73 HB #25 :: 68 HB #30 :: 65 HB #22 :: 63 K #15 :: 85 K #4 :: 54 LE #40 :: 91 LE #94 :: 80 LE #98 :: 66 LG #74 :: 73 LG #67 :: 72 LG #64 :: 71 LOLB #52 :: 80 LOLB #54 :: 73 LOLB #38 :: 70 LT #72 :: 69 LT #71 :: 68 MLB #27 :: 81 MLB #39 :: 69 MLB #29 :: 66 MLB #59 :: 59 P #11 :: 71 QB #12 :: 79 QB #14 :: 70 QB #13 :: 58 RE #70 :: 79 RE #97 :: 61 RE #91 :: 60 RG #68 :: 71 RG #77 :: 62 ROLB #34 :: 72 ROLB #36 :: 68 RT #82 :: 73 RT #79 :: 72 SS #41 :: 74 SS #32 :: 66 TE #86 :: 86 TE #89 :: 74 TE #87 :: 70 WR #17 :: 80 WR #5 :: 77 WR #9 :: 74 WR #26 :: 72 WR #24 :: 72 WR #2 :: 70 WR #88 :: 66 WR #80 :: 66 WR #83 :: 62
Ugh, looks like I'm going to go down to varsity for the first season......
"I think Couchem is right." -EVERYONE
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests
|
|