Why no Beasley?

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:12 pm

Am I mistaken, or did Cole Beasley (82) not play Saturday?

by **J.T.supporta** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:14 pm

the participation list says he played

http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... l#GAME.PRE

by **RGV Pony** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:16 pm

participation list also shows that Bonilla played in his jersey and a pair of shorts

by **Nacho** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:46 pm

I saw a pass that was overthrown to him. Am I on top of this stuff or what?

by **PonyPride** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:22 pm

You're all over it, Nacho.
Beasley had two passes thrown his way, as I recall.

by **mrydel** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:52 pm

I thought that was Cole Loftin.

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:04 pm

Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?

by **mrydel** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:12 pm

SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?

You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?

by **JasonB** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:12 pm

No, Beasley was out there, but not much. Bryant was used in his place as the fourth WR, and Wilkerson was the third WR.

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:15 pm

mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?

You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?

Nope, I guess not.

Just surprised he was not used more. That little #23 for TXSt was sprinting past our line all day. Thought Beasley could have been used in the same way.

by **mrydel** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:21 pm

SmooBoy wrote:
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:Loftin is listed as 84, Beasley 82. Did they change numbers?

You are going to trust the numbers on a participation chart that shows an injured player that was in Hawaiian type jams as having played in the game?

Nope, I guess not.

Just surprised he was not used more. That little #23 for TXSt was sprinting past our line all day. Thought Beasley could have been used in the same way.

Apparently Loftin has not played this year. I thought I had heard his name called on the long overthrow. Probably was Beasley and I heard Cole and just thought Loftin. Thats the kind of guy I am.

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:36 pm

We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me. :lol:

by **mrydel** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:57 pm

SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me.

I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:17 pm

mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me.

I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.

Yep, a BO-el of Cole while Justin time to sing "Emmanuel."

by **Come and Take It** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:21 pm

SmooBoy wrote:
mrydel wrote:
SmooBoy wrote:We seem to be starting a Cole-ony of WRs. They will be Loftin up to catch it. You've got to Beasleys in these guys. I kill me.

I guess you know with bad puns like that what you will get for Christmas.

Yep, a BO-el of Cole while Justin time to sing "Emmanuel."

Please stop, or I will be forced to include you in a new trio including the Pony Up song and the PA guy. :lol:

Why no Beasley?

Why no Beasley?

Who is online