|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by MiracleOnMockingbird » Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:37 am
Before yesterday all I knew about Lunday was the Alfred E. Neuman-like photo that was on this website on signing day...
He looked pretty quick on the few carries he got.
He and Lee give me some hope for next year's RB situation.
-

MiracleOnMockingbird

-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:43 pm
by jimhagle » Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:30 am
Nice way to burn his red shirt year this late-where was B.J. Lee?
-
jimhagle

-
- Posts: 1478
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:14 pm
- Location: dallas
by SoCal_Pony » Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:57 am
MiracleOnMockingbird wrote:Before yesterday all I knew about Lunday was the Alfred E. Neuman-like photo that was on this website on signing day...
He looked pretty quick on the few carries he got.
He and Lee give me some hope for next year's RB situation.
what a typical sunshine comment
NEWS FLASH - a team full of Lunday's and Lee's will not break .500 in C-USA
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by Stallion » Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:01 pm
.....in their Senior years. Now a couple of these guys might become complementary players but quite frankly I believe-and hope-much of the vaunted 2008 Class are "recruited over". I see about 3-4 guys in the Class that probably have a chance to really be key players in a top football program. I think we already "recruited over" the offensive line recruits and several of the Receiver recruits.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by TheBestAvailable » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:50 pm
Stallion wrote:.....in their Senior years. Now a couple of these guys might become complementary players but quite frankly I believe-and hope-much of the vaunted 2008 Class are "recruited over". I see about 3-4 guys in the Class that probably have a chance to really be key players in a top football program. I think we already "recruited over" the offensive line recruits and several of the Receiver recruits.
I don't understand what your saying. What do you mean by "recruited over"?
-

TheBestAvailable

-
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:09 pm
- Location: Downtown Dallas
by Stallion » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:34 pm
See highlites of Darius Johnson on Recruiting board. "Recruiting over" means when SMU gets some better recruits a lot of the vaunted 2008 Class are going to be riding the bench.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by SMUMan02 » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:56 pm
In this offense I don't care who the backs are.
Class of '02
-

SMUMan02

-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:08 am
- Location: Tyler, TX
-
by Charleston Pony » Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:14 pm
SMUMan02 wrote:In this offense I don't care who the backs are.
yes; you really should. In this offense, as in ANY offense, you have to be able to run effectively enough to keep the defense honest. The LBs are dropping to cut off the passing lanes and there are opportunities for a RB with quick feet and the ability to see the field an cut back effectively to run to daylight. Lunday showed that ability, although at 175 lbs, it may not take many shots to affect his health
He was one of the few bright spots Saturday
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28985
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by TheBestAvailable » Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:29 pm
Stallion wrote:See highlites of Darius Johnson on Recruiting board. "Recruiting over" means when SMU gets some better recruits a lot of the vaunted 2008 Class are going to be riding the bench.
I agree.
-

TheBestAvailable

-
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:09 pm
- Location: Downtown Dallas
by PoconoPony » Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:40 pm
Charleston Pony wrote:SMUMan02 wrote:In this offense I don't care who the backs are.
yes; you really should. In this offense, as in ANY offense, you have to be able to run effectively enough to keep the defense honest. The LBs are dropping to cut off the passing lanes and there are opportunities for a RB with quick feet and the ability to see the field an cut back effectively to run to daylight. Lunday showed that ability, although at 175 lbs, it may not take many shots to affect his health He was one of the few bright spots Saturday
There are opportunities for a running back in this offense based on what defenses must do to combat the passing game; however, our O line simply has provided few opportunities for any running back to find an initial hole and clear the line enough to use any quickness or running skills. Our backs are getting hit as they take the hand off or within a step of getting the ball. They simply have had no chance to make any runs and losen up any defenses. Our dismal stats support this problem.
-
PoconoPony

-
- Posts: 4436
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:01 pm
- Location: Nesquehoning, Pennsylvania
by giacfsp » Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:16 pm
Stallion wrote:.....in their Senior years. Now a couple of these guys might become complementary players but quite frankly I believe-and hope-much of the vaunted 2008 Class are "recruited over". I see about 3-4 guys in the Class that probably have a chance to really be key players in a top football program. I think we already "recruited over" the offensive line recruits and several of the Receiver recruits.
That (bold) statement carries a lot more weight if you name them. I'm not challenging you - I agree with you - but I'm curious who you see as future cornerstones.
To me, it's Taylor Thompson, Chris Banjo, maybe Cole Beasley or Cole Loftin ... and who knows what we have in the redshirts.
-

giacfsp

-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by SMU21TCU10 » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:28 pm
giacfsp wrote:Stallion wrote:.....in their Senior years. Now a couple of these guys might become complementary players but quite frankly I believe-and hope-much of the vaunted 2008 Class are "recruited over". I see about 3-4 guys in the Class that probably have a chance to really be key players in a top football program. I think we already "recruited over" the offensive line recruits and several of the Receiver recruits.
That (bold) statement carries a lot more weight if you name them. I'm not challenging you - I agree with you - but I'm curious who you see as future cornerstones. To me, it's Taylor Thompson, Chris Banjo, maybe Cole Beasley or Cole Loftin ... and who knows what we have in the redshirts.
Im also interested to see how the 2 greyshirt linebackers pan out. As well as a few of our redshirted OL and Drewery. I think Keith Robinson will eventually be a player. And maybe one of our DT's will step up once they get more experience
-

SMU21TCU10

-
- Posts: 4347
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Mos Eisley, Tatooine
by EastStang » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:33 pm
He looked pretty good We would have been better off the entire game, putting McKinney at fullback, Lunday at tailback and running the ball 20 times.
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12668
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by that's great raplh » Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:37 pm
EastStang wrote:He looked pretty good We would have been better off the entire game, putting McKinney at fullback, Lunday at tailback and running the ball 20 times.
amen
muffie benson perella
169 black horseshoes - Green Party Activist - I am the Greetest!
Now selling Hope at a price slightly higher than free...
-

that's great raplh

-
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: bottom of a sewer
by PonyTales » Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:09 am
Lunday showed a nice burst, and I have heard that coaches and teammates alike are impressed with his overall athleticism. In the little we saw on TV, I'd have to agree.
-

PonyTales

-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests
|
|