Wow...Johnson takes a bunch of GT

by **FordtoTolbert** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:56 pm

players, who are ill suited for his system, and rocks along at 8-3 in his first year....did we intrview this guy?!? Just kidding...LOVE JJ, he will be "Johnson like" soon, book it!! Long Live First Year Turn Arounds.

by **SmooBoy** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:58 pm

Wasn't it awful to see the "U" get steamrolled into a sideways l :lol:

by **CalallenStang** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:58 pm

According to Stallion, PJ would have been a disaster here.

by **abezontar** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:00 pm

you should probably look at Ga Tech's last 6 years...[deleted]

by **FordtoTolbert** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:01 pm

What? Is Stallion your PF version of Obama?

by **FordtoTolbert** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:03 pm

GT's last 6 years?? Something like 3-3 in BOWL GAMES....not bad work, if you can get it.

by **CalallenStang** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:11 pm

FordtoTolbert wrote:What? Is Stallion your PF version of Obama?

Haha - not even close. I think PJ would have been a great hire here (not that JJ isn't a great hire). Stallion thinks he would have been horrible. In fact, according to Stallion, the only reason why he is doing well at GT is because he inherited a great defense.

by **FordtoTolbert** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:13 pm

defense laid 41 on the U last night....

by **abezontar** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:23 pm

FordtoTolbert wrote:GT's last 6 years?? Something like 3-3 in BOWL GAMES....not bad work, if you can get it.

right but no fewer than 7 wins in any season it's not as though there was nothing there to work with

by **SMUtrojanFAN** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:29 pm

If he beats UGA, Ga Tech will be happy with their hire.

by **jimhagle** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:02 pm

The announcers on the game last night were wondering why more teams don't run PJ's offense given his success. Maybe because they aren't PJ-the guy can flat coach and would have done very well here no doubt.

by **jkflamebo** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:45 pm

the GT play calling was great all night long. miami is just off the map, looked very mediocre all over the field

by PK » Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:15 pm

No doubt SMU's talent level would compare very favorably with GT's talent level...right. :roll:

Does anyone really think we have the RB's and OL to produce a running option style offense? And then there is our defense... There is a reason PJ wasn't interested in SMU. I'm just surprised JJ was interested other than that he loves a challenge...and there probably wasn't a bigger one around...and $2 mil a year. :wink:

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:54 pm

472 yards rushing last night.

by **J.T.supporta** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:28 pm

we might have actually had a bad [deleted] run game since the 80s if PJ was here

Wow...Johnson takes a bunch of GT

Wow...Johnson takes a bunch of GT

Who is online