Facilities

by **Pony_Fan** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:27 am

Other than not having a IPF, how do our current facilities stack up against Baylor, Texas State, A&M, Houston, Rice, etc?

Weight room, locker rooms, meeting rooms, practice fields, etc...

Sterling Moore posted this on his FB page a while back - overview of Missouri - pretty cool facility

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2hVcebRA2E

by **San Antonio Mustang** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:45 pm

I don't know about the others, but we are way ahead of Texas State.

by **spacepony** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:24 pm

San Antonio Mustang wrote:I don't know about the others, but we are way ahead of Texas State.

And ahead of Rice and Houston....understand Houston is trying to raise $ for facilities. UH intermural athletic facilities are new (2004) and are great and the Natatorium is well thought of.

by **PonyPlayer4** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:06 pm

Why would Sterling post this on his FB page?

by **Pony_Law** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:58 pm

SMU has very good facilities from what I have seen but could definetly use an IPF, Circle of champions get to work.

by **Pony_Fan** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:09 pm

PonyPlayer4 wrote:Why would Sterling post this on his FB page?

I guess b/c it's a nice facility - he said something like "this is nice --Orsini get to work"

by **Mexmustang** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:09 pm

Oh Madalin...

by **expony18** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:19 pm

we have a long way to go if we want to be top 25

by **Samurai Stang** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:34 pm

Pony_Fan wrote:
PonyPlayer4 wrote:Why would Sterling post this on his FB page?

I guess b/c it's a nice facility - he said something like "this is nice --Orsini get to work"

Based upon recent events, one can assume that the problem lies with Turner.

by **mavsrage311** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:38 pm

We are getting a remodeled locker room before next season that should be pretty sweet

by **Dutch** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:56 pm

i heard the same.

by **lwjr** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:31 pm

comparing state schools to private schools is not a real fair comparisons. ND, SC and Miami being the exception

by **gostangs** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:34 pm

I think the distincion is more BCS vs non BCS. Its about a 6M swing per year if you never even go to a bowl.

by **b_caesar** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:05 pm

It only takes money.

by **Samurai Stang** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:06 pm

b_caesar wrote:It only takes money.

And university support. Without Turner's backing for a practice facility, money is useless.

I highly doubt that money is the issue. Given SMU's recent history, financial support has been far easier to attain than Turner's support.

Facilities

Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Re: Facilities

Who is online