Would the conversation change if we asked profit or non-profit, especially since we don't generate "positive operating margin" in any sport.
I appreciate that all sports are recognized and we have richer college experience for our student-athletes with our commitment to excellence in more than FB and BB.
If you look at the BCS schools, they are committed to a lot more sports and associated facilities than most non-BCS schools, especially the private ones. For SMU to be a NCAA player, the commitment and results of soccer, volleyball, swimming & diving, rowing, equestrian (can you say Title IX?), golf, tennis, etc. is very important.
I lament the loss of men's track & field; but we better stay fully invested in the remaining varsity sports.
