A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
NickSMU17
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5668
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Hinsdale, IL

A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by NickSMU17 »

Numbers.

To keep the status quo, the "big boys" need 50% +1 FBS votes on their side at all times.

Right now, there are 120 FBS teams.

Add up what we have for 2012 right now, more or less:

B10+B12+P12+SEC+ACC+ND = 12+10+12+13+14+1 = 62

Cutting it pretty close already.

Now, we know of 3 teams coming into FBS: TX ST, UT-SA and UMASS

62 of 123 just barely makes the cut.

A couple more come in and suddenly, they are outvoted.

I think the other Big leagues are really hoping the Big 12 goes back to 12, to give them the cushion they need before they drop the Big East auto-bid.
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by goldenstang »

Interesting. I think they would be more likely to keep the Big East bid than give the MWC one.
User avatar
GRGB
All-American
All-American
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by GRGB »

NickSMU17 wrote:Numbers.

To keep the status quo, the "big boys" need 50% +1 FBS votes on their side at all times.

Right now, there are 120 FBS teams.

Add up what we have for 2012 right now, more or less:

B10+B12+P12+SEC+ACC+ND = 12+10+12+13+14+1 = 62

Cutting it pretty close already.

Now, we know of 3 teams coming into FBS: TX ST, UT-SA and UMASS

62 of 123 just barely makes the cut.

A couple more come in and suddenly, they are outvoted.

I think the other Big leagues are really hoping the Big 12 goes back to 12, to give them the cushion they need before they drop the Big East auto-bid.


Yeah, except then they just vote themselves a new league
NickSMU17
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5668
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Hinsdale, IL

Re: A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by NickSMU17 »

Legal fees would be a killer...
User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Re: Re: A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by whitwiki »

NickSMU17 wrote:Legal fees would be a killer...


Killer for the smaller conferences?
StangCP
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:46 pm
Location: Cambridge Place

Re: A good point for keeping Big east or MWC AQ

Post by StangCP »

2 AQ conferences voted no on BCS to begin with over a decade ago. Funny how that works, seeing non-AQ conferences/schools setup a system that excludes them
Post Reply