NickSMU17 wrote:East coast what does a great fan like you do for SMU? Tell me so I can model myself....
Not [deleted] all over our coach in a public forum. Believe it or not, recruits and their parents read these message boards. Hopefully I don't have to tell you that. If you have issues with JJ and want to voice them, then that's fine. You're free to do so. PF wouldn't be fun if everyone agreed all of the time. But the constant barrage of vitriol towards a guy who has done more for this program than anyone in a quarter century gets old after awhile. It doesn't really bother me, I'm just sitting here in front of a computer pretending to do work, but when people have to read over and over again what a [deleted] guy June Jones is and how he needs to get out, well, maybe it's true and maybe it's not (I don't know JJ personally) but fairly or unfairly it plants seeds in the minds of recruits and their families, seeds we as SMU fans shouldn't want to be planted for the good of the program.
The fact is, what JJ has done is no different than what coaches at dozens of other mid-major and even lower-tier BCS programs do every single season. And again, the fact that this is even happening at SMU is a sign of the progress we've made in four years.
So tell me, Nick, your profile says you're in "derivatives" so I'm going to assume you have some rudimentary knowledge of the financial world.
Let's say there was a major company 25 years ago, one of the biggest in the country. And then it faced a major scandal and was never the same again. Chapter 11, massive layoffs, etc. The company survived, but was only a shell of its former self, and was nothing but an afterthought and a joke for many years afterwards. People had almost forgotten about the company decades later.
And then, along came a new CEO. A CEO who had turned around another company before with impressive success. This new CEO came in, and the first year was one of reorganization with no difference in results. But in the second year, the CEO's prowess paid off, and the company's stock price soared higher than it had at any point since the scandal. Granted it was nowhere close to its old success, but it was still more success than the company had seen in 25 years. People even started seeing commericals for the company on TV again, and couldn't believe it. They though the company had folded years ago. The second and third year, the company continued its profitability. After the third year, though, the CEO was courted by another struggling company. And then, unexpectedly, the board of directors fired the CEO and replaced him with the company's young hotshot marketing whiz, who was just a few years removed from business school. Would you think that was a smart business decision?