Rivals ups our no-stars

by **GoRedGoBlue** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:29 pm

http://rivals100.rivals.com/commitlist.asp?School=182

Looks like our 3As are now 2-stars, and our average has jumped a bit.

But, our "rank" is still at #70, probably not updated yet.

Kentucky is #53 with an average rank of 2.14 where we are 2.24, we both have equal number of 3stars and we now have no 'no-stars' where they have 1. And how is Wyoming two above us? (2 3stars and only one 5.5, next is a 5.2).

Wait a few days, see how it shakes out.

by **The Q** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:46 pm

Hmmmm .... on one hand, that's impressive, in that we have NOBODY with fewer than two stars, and three three-star guys. Sounds like the class is better than many (myself included, admittedly) thought.

On the other hand, that list is incomplete -- no Randall Goode, no Troy Therien.

And Tim Monroe is still on there. Anyone know the official deal on him?

by **Stallion** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:48 am

98% of all prospects get 2 stars unless they are from Sunbelt like conferences.

by **Eddie P** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:19 am

Careful...

Clown-boy MeanGreenGem monitors this board and shows up when there is a mention of the Sunbelt and/or North Texas.

by **GoRedGoBlue** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:31 am

Stallion wrote:98% of all prospects get 2 stars unless they are from Sunbelt like conferences.

but 3 or 4 of ours had NO stars for a while, whereas some teams STILL have some no stars, and we do not.

BTW: we have 5 3-stars, not 3 (to an earlier writer)

by **ClassOf81** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:42 am

I was about to point out the same thing.
And three of the JUCOs are 3-star guys. So they're not only relatively mature, but talented, as well.
Can't wait for spring ball!

Rivals ups our no-stars

Rivals ups our no-stars

Re:

Who is online