Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

zimo
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 9:25 pm

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by zimo »

Sadly for the Big East, they are at the mercy of the Big XII who will probably throw a monkey wrench into this whole thing.
User avatar
SMU_Alumni11
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
Location: Somewhere near Knox

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by SMU_Alumni11 »

To all,

How do you think the tv deal will turn out?

Do you think we will get the 10mil or more a team for all sports? Or settle for less?

Do you think it will end up with ESPN? Or who else?

I'm pulling for the 10 mil with fox sports since they take gambles and it usually pays off
User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island
Contact:

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by westexSMU »

I say more than 11 million per team...I think ESPN has done everything it can to try to keep starting negotiations low, but it is not working. A good deal will be made for the Big East.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by gostangs »

west is right - from people that are in the know. It wont be 15 - but will be more then 11
User avatar
SMU_Alumni11
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
Location: Somewhere near Knox

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by SMU_Alumni11 »

I hope y'all are right I would have been happy with original deal but hey a few more mil is fine with me
skurtn
All-American
All-American
Posts: 592
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:40 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by skurtn »

I think what ever we get will be great for SMU when going to the Big East, certainly from a basketball perspective.
Overall though, the BE is in contention to still be a strong money conference.

Losing Syracuse to the ACC is a big loss for basketball. Nothing really replaces them.
Gaining Boise will be a great replacement for Pitt. Syracuse is a non-factor.
Overall, I just don't see how much can hurt BE, even with additional weaker CUSA teams.
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5527
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by Water Pony »

WVA was the biggest loss from FB (but not from a market) perspective, since Syracuse and Pitt football are less marquee teams now.

Louisivlle, Cincinnati and Rutgers have emerged the stronger legacy BE teams with Temple now showing a rebirth. With BSU (and perhaps SDSU, as the most attractive, non-PAC12 team in California) bringing street cred, BE looks competitive and attractive to the media. With Navy and two Florida and Texas schools, our media rights should be of great value before adding the strong BB brand with it's Madison Square Garden championship.

BE brings strength in large metro areas, competitive Top 25 teams and coast to coast media interest. I sense Fox or NBC will be more aggressive than our "friends" at ESPN.
Pony Up
skurtn
All-American
All-American
Posts: 592
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:40 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by skurtn »

Oh yes, how could I forget about WVU. Sorry

EDIT: Check out this interesting diagram of the new conference landscape in the U.S.
pick
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5527
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by Water Pony »

skurtn wrote:Oh yes, how could I forget about WVU. Sorry

EDIT: Check out this interesting diagram of the new conference landscape in the U.S.
pick
Thanks for sharing the diagram, which in only missing the more recent decision by Navy to join the BE. So, which FB school(s) should BE add to round-up to 14 (1) or possibly 16 (3)?
Pony Up
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12696
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by EastStang »

I posted a link Article on the Basketball thread about John Thompson III in which he mentioned how adding SMU helps the BE. It helps recruiting and adds another media market. Note that the additions with the exception of Boise are good media market teams SDS, SMU, UH, UCF, Memphis, Temple. Even Navy has a good TV Q rating. Look at the decent programs left out. ECU, USM, Tulsa. I personally think that the BE will be second only to the ACC in hoops, and may be better long term in football with Boise, Louisville, Temple and hopefully SMU. Only FSU, Clemson, VT bring any strength to the ACC in football. All three have warts this year.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
User avatar
Digetydog
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3913
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by Digetydog »

EastStang wrote:I posted a link Article on the Basketball thread about John Thompson III in which he mentioned how adding SMU helps the BE. It helps recruiting and adds another media market. Note that the additions with the exception of Boise are good media market teams SDS, SMU, UH, UCF, Memphis, Temple. Even Navy has a good TV Q rating. Look at the decent programs left out. ECU, USM, Tulsa. I personally think that the BE will be second only to the ACC in hoops, and may be better long term in football with Boise, Louisville, Temple and hopefully SMU. Only FSU, Clemson, VT bring any strength to the ACC in football. All three have warts this year.

Right now, the Big East has a better football presence in the Top 25 than the Big10 and the ACC combined.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
User avatar
MustangStealth
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4093
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible

Re: Big East commish Aresco talks TV deal, bowls, future

Post by MustangStealth »

SMU_Alumni11 wrote:To all,

How do you think the tv deal will turn out?

Do you think we will get the 10mil or more a team for all sports? Or settle for less?

Do you think it will end up with ESPN? Or who else?

I'm pulling for the 10 mil with fox sports since they take gambles and it usually pays off
1. Probably 8-10 million
2. A little less
3. Probably with someone else. ESPN has a full schedule and no need to bid high. The only bargaining chip with them really is BBall. I hope we don't end up on Fox since they are still not 100% in HD, especially for non-football.
Post Reply