PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Realistic Targets ITT

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby ponyinNC » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:33 pm

Thanks for the info OBF.

I love how a poster from Ohio seems to be more "in the know" about our prospects and our program than most current SMU students!

This is what we need - more casual sports fans that become SMU fans for any reason, be it Coach Brown, Coach Jones, our recruits, our school , heck even if they just like our colors and the way that "smew" just rolls off the tongue!
User avatar
ponyinNC
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4974
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby mrydel » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:35 pm

When Mudiay committed I bought season tickets. When Turner signs, I move back to Dallas to better use my season tickets.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32036
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby ponyinNC » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:59 pm

mrydel wrote:When Mudiay committed I bought season tickets. When Turner signs, I move back to Dallas to better use my season tickets.


:lol:
User avatar
ponyinNC
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4974
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby Harry0569 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:03 pm

mrydel wrote:When Mudiay committed I bought season tickets. When Turner signs, I move back to Dallas to better use my season tickets.


...or better yet sell them online and make $$$$$$$
"smupony94: Harry, you have been promoted to purveyor of official status capabilities."
User avatar
Harry0569
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8938
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby LHS81 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:14 pm

Does Stanley Johnson signing with Arizona increase SMU's chance at Jonah Bolden?
2015 INDIANAPOLIS OR BUST
User avatar
LHS81
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:16 pm
Location: Arlington,Tx

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby SMU 86 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:42 pm

LHS81 wrote:Does Stanley Johnson signing with Arizona increase SMU's chance at Jonah Bolden?


Now that is an interesting question.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby hoopmanx » Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:27 pm

Zona is a possibility but the main comp in UCLA. We have some leverage though
User avatar
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby Treadway21 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:31 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:The paid attendance was 3,200 but there were actually 1,250-1,500 there. The rest were season ticket holders who didn't show. As LH said, there may have been 20-30 students there.
there was more than 1500, but definitely less than 50 students from what I could tell.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Treadway21
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6586
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby OhioBrownFan » Fri Nov 15, 2013 9:48 pm

LHS81 wrote:Does Stanley Johnson signing with Arizona increase SMU's chance at Jonah Bolden?

I would certainly think it plays a role. But it really comes down to how hard Zona is recruiting him. Obviously with Johnson in the mix, they may not have that need anymore, then it undoubtedly would help SMU. I can ask that analyst tomorrow if he knows anything. But they still might feel the need to add his skill-set. From what I read, he didn't say much other than Zona and UCLA are the front-runners with Bolden. Therefore, I assume Miller is still going after Bolden otherwise he would have said they cut ties or at least filled the need. Know what I mean?

Either way, I'm somewhat disappointed. I don't think there's a good chance of landing any of the prospects and Brown might get left holding the bag. Obviously banking the scholarship isn't going to hurt, but there is a need for a legitimate big if you're trying to make a deep run with Mudiay in the mix. The forwards on the team are good, but to really push the team to the next level, it'd be nice to add solid depth at the 3 and 4. It doesn't sound like the net is cast very wide and most of the "top" prospects are off the board with the early signing period passing.
User avatar
OhioBrownFan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:25 pm

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby SMU 86 » Sat Nov 16, 2013 12:04 am

OhioBrownFan wrote:
LHS81 wrote:Does Stanley Johnson signing with Arizona increase SMU's chance at Jonah Bolden?

I would certainly think it plays a role. But it really comes down to how hard Zona is recruiting him. Obviously with Johnson in the mix, they may not have that need anymore, then it undoubtedly would help SMU. I can ask that analyst tomorrow if he knows anything. But they still might feel the need to add his skill-set. From what I read, he didn't say much other than Zona and UCLA are the front-runners with Bolden. Therefore, I assume Miller is still going after Bolden otherwise he would have said they cut ties or at least filled the need. Know what I mean?

Either way, I'm somewhat disappointed. I don't think there's a good chance of landing any of the prospects and Brown might get left holding the bag. Obviously banking the scholarship isn't going to hurt, but there is a need for a legitimate big if you're trying to make a deep run with Mudiay in the mix. The forwards on the team are good, but to really push the team to the next level, it'd be nice to add solid depth at the 3 and 4. It doesn't sound like the net is cast very wide and most of the "top" prospects are off the board with the early signing period passing.


I think the need for a big is not as urgent as some think. None of our bigs graduate next year and are getting good time this year. By the way we have more 2 scholarships available now that Jalen is transferring.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby gostangs » Sat Nov 16, 2013 12:06 am

we can still take a transfer or JC in that 3 or 4 spot also.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby OhioBrownFan » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:01 am

SMU 86 wrote:
OhioBrownFan wrote:
LHS81 wrote:Does Stanley Johnson signing with Arizona increase SMU's chance at Jonah Bolden?

I would certainly think it plays a role. But it really comes down to how hard Zona is recruiting him. Obviously with Johnson in the mix, they may not have that need anymore, then it undoubtedly would help SMU. I can ask that analyst tomorrow if he knows anything. But they still might feel the need to add his skill-set. From what I read, he didn't say much other than Zona and UCLA are the front-runners with Bolden. Therefore, I assume Miller is still going after Bolden otherwise he would have said they cut ties or at least filled the need. Know what I mean?

Either way, I'm somewhat disappointed. I don't think there's a good chance of landing any of the prospects and Brown might get left holding the bag. Obviously banking the scholarship isn't going to hurt, but there is a need for a legitimate big if you're trying to make a deep run with Mudiay in the mix. The forwards on the team are good, but to really push the team to the next level, it'd be nice to add solid depth at the 3 and 4. It doesn't sound like the net is cast very wide and most of the "top" prospects are off the board with the early signing period passing.


I think the need for a big is not as urgent as some think. None of our bigs graduate next year and are getting good time this year. By the way we have more 2 scholarships available now that Jalen is transferring.

It's not a matter of being urgent. It's a matter of upgrading the talent. I know it's going to take some getting used to lol, but when you have a team that should compete for an elite 8 spot, you can't have the bigs that SMU has right now. I think right now, Brown is looking at the Elite 8, definitely Sweet 16 right now. Therefore, you need to upgrade the bigs and/or at least give them quality depth if that makes sense. That's the way I look at the team, and I'm an outsider. Mudiay alone won't take them to the promised land, there needs to be upgrades, it's no different then last year to this year. SMU returned all 5 starters, yet 2 are starting? I'm not even sure if I'm correct, but that tells you the talent influx. That needs to happen again next year to make the team a serious player come March.
User avatar
OhioBrownFan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:25 pm

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby hoopmanx » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:58 am

OBF, everyone is interested in upgrading the talent, and we need a big, but its not as urgent as you suggest. We need a shooter just as much, and 3 and/or a face-up 4. By this time next year we'll return Moreira, Kennedy, Moore, Cunningham. That's a very solid big rotation before additions. I can think of many top 25 programs that aren't running that type of depth, athleticism right now, much less a year from now. Certainly, we're not good to the point of not needing Turner/Bolden, but players matter more than position. We have 2 kids that can stretch the D, we need more. In that regard, losing Bernardi really hurt
User avatar
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby OhioBrownFan » Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:17 pm

hoopmanx wrote:OBF, everyone is interested in upgrading the talent, and we need a big, but its not as urgent as you suggest. We need a shooter just as much, and 3 and/or a face-up 4. By this time next year we'll return Moreira, Kennedy, Moore, Cunningham. That's a very solid big rotation before additions. I can think of many top 25 programs that aren't running that type of depth, athleticism right now, much less a year from now. Certainly, we're not good to the point of not needing Turner/Bolden, but players matter more than position. We have 2 kids that can stretch the D, we need more. In that regard, losing Bernardi really hurt

I agree a shooter would be nice, but I can name quite a few teams that don't have JJ Reddick on their team in the top 10. There's guys that can knock it down and Mudiay will be able to as well. There needs to be production out of the forwards, on the scoring end if this team really wants to get deep in the tournament next year, so while we disagree, I think it is something that really needs addressed this year if possible. Moreira is a depth guy on top 10-15 teams, and he's only got a year left I believe (JUCO).
User avatar
OhioBrownFan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:25 pm

Re: Realistic Targets ITT

Postby LA_Mustang » Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:27 pm

OBF, I think you're slighting Moreira a bit. He has an NBA body and nose for the ball on the boards and blocking shots. He definitely needs work on the offensive end but the tools are there.
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

Image
User avatar
LA_Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15604
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: El Porto, CA 90266

PreviousNext

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests