Bracketology

by **SMU2007** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:26 am

ESPN Bracketology:
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

We are projected as an 11 seed! Pretty exciting.

by **Harry0569** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:40 am

We've got like 10 threads about RPI, Ken Pom Rankings, Bracketology.

I vote that we use THIS THREAD as the main source.

by **LA_Mustang** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:20 am

Again, I think it's funny that the conference the new Big East left behind (AAC - 5) has more teams in and the conference the new Big East raided has more teams in (A10 - 5) than the Big Least - 4. :lol:

by **S....M....U** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:20 am

+1

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

by **Digetydog** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:57 am

LA_Mustang wrote:Again, I think it's funny that the conference the new Big East left behind (AAC - 5) has more teams in and the conference the new Big East raided has more teams in (A10 - 5) than the Big Least - 4.

In their defense, the main reasons that they left were control and cost. First, the BB schools did not want their future dictated by football. Second, the cost of travel would have been difficult for relatively small Catholic schools to absorb.

In their place, I would probably have done the same thing.

by **Charleston Pony** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:31 pm

I've always liked the 12-13 seed spot in the tourney. Beat a 4/5 and get another in 2nd round...nice path to Sweet 16. Next best thing is a 10/11 seed, but that 8/9 is tough. Let's just hope our guys earn their way in

by **RI Stang** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:59 pm

Agree on 12/13 seed slot. The only problem these days is that typically requires an extra game with the "First Four" which only seems like a play in to get into the real tourney. Not that I will be complaining with any appearance mind you...

by **indianmustang** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:09 pm

11th seed according this website
http://rushthecourt.net/2014/01/18/rtc- ... 8-edition/

by **mrydel** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:44 pm

RI Stang wrote:Agree on 12/13 seed slot. The only problem these days is that typically requires an extra game with the "First Four" which only seems like a play in to get into the real tourney. Not that I will be complaining with any appearance mind you...

Isn't it the 16th seed that has the play in ?

by **Smerkins** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:48 pm

A couple of years ago they created something that is called the "First Four". Its played in Dayton, OH every year and has 4 play in games. 2 for a 12 seed and 2 for a 16 seed.

Also this is now officially termed as the first round. Really stupid.

by **GiddyUp** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:48 pm

Give it a rest until March folks

by **mrydel** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:49 pm

Smerkins wrote:A couple of years ago they created something that is called the "First Four". Its played in Dayton, OH every year and has 4 play in games. 2 for a 12 seed and 2 for a 16 seed.

My bad. I just assumed the 4 16s had a play in.

by **Grant Carter** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:23 pm

GiddyUp wrote:Give it a rest until March folks

Why?

by **Stallion** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:33 pm

we have a great shot to be 17-4. If we can win these easier games it could really be fun when Memphis comes to Moody. Wake me up.

by **Mustangs_Maroons** » Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:47 pm

I see us favored in the next 3 games. Let's take care of business at home and beat Houston, and I think we would be favored at home against Memphis.

Bracketology

Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Re: Bracketology

Who is online